PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKF vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKF vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI BRIC ETF (BKF) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKF achieves a -7.90% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 20.71% return. Over the past 10 years, BKF has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 4.94%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.84% annualized return.


BKF

1D
0.07%
1M
-4.18%
YTD
-7.90%
6M
-8.83%
1Y
0.96%
3Y*
8.10%
5Y*
-4.04%
10Y*
4.94%

QQQ

1D
-0.48%
1M
8.66%
YTD
20.71%
6M
19.19%
1Y
40.74%
3Y*
28.54%
5Y*
17.86%
10Y*
21.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKF vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BKF
iShares MSCI BRIC ETF
-7.90%22.30%9.24%1.27%-21.78%-11.87%16.52%22.93%-13.80%41.80%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
20.71%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between BKF and QQQ is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2007

0.62

The correlation between BKF and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (3 years) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BKF vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BKF
QQQ

Financial Services

23.7%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

19.5%
12.3%

Communication Services

12.6%
15.8%

Technology

7.9%
53.8%

Basic Materials

7.3%
1.1%

Energy

7.2%
0.6%

Industrials

7.2%
2.8%

Healthcare

5.2%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
7.7%

Utilities

3.9%
1.4%

Real Estate

1.3%
0.1%

Financial Services

BKF
23.7%
QQQ
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

BKF
19.5%
QQQ
12.3%

Communication Services

BKF
12.6%
QQQ
15.8%

Technology

BKF
7.9%
QQQ
53.8%

Basic Materials

BKF
7.3%
QQQ
1.1%

Energy

BKF
7.2%
QQQ
0.6%

Industrials

BKF
7.2%
QQQ
2.8%

Healthcare

BKF
5.2%
QQQ
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

BKF
4.2%
QQQ
7.7%

Utilities

BKF
3.9%
QQQ
1.4%

Real Estate

BKF
1.3%
QQQ
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKF vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKF
BKF Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
BKF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKF Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
BKF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKF Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKF vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI BRIC ETF (BKF) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKFQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.44

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

3.42

-3.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.19

13.14

-12.96

BKF vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKF Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKF and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKFQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

2.57

-2.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

0.80

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.98

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

0.41

-0.41

Drawdowns

BKF vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKF drawdown since its inception was -70.29%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKF and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKFQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.29%

-82.97%

+12.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.43%

-11.96%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.60%

-22.77%

+4.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.94%

-35.12%

-9.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.20%

-35.12%

-14.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.41%

-0.74%

-24.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.11%

-32.78%

+4.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.16%

3.11%

+2.05%

Volatility

BKF vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI BRIC ETF (BKF) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.51%. This indicates that BKF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKFQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.44%

4.51%

+0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.40%

12.10%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.53%

15.94%

-0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.51%

22.37%

-0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.77%

22.29%

-0.52%

BKF vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKF has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKF vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

BKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKF
iShares MSCI BRIC ETF
1.95%1.79%2.37%1.68%2.04%2.93%1.02%1.66%2.33%1.51%1.82%3.15%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKF and QQQ have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKF has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to QQQ (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKF dropped -70.29% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.84% vs 4.94% for BKF. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.84% return vs 4.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for BKF.

BKF has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.

BKF is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. BKF tracks MSCI BRIC Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for BKF and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKF and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer