PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKF vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKF vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI BRIC ETF (BKF) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKF achieves a -7.90% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 9.64% return. Over the past 10 years, BKF has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 4.94%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.34% annualized return.


BKF

1D
0.07%
1M
-4.18%
YTD
-7.90%
6M
-8.83%
1Y
0.96%
3Y*
8.10%
5Y*
-4.04%
10Y*
4.94%

DGRO

1D
0.81%
1M
3.27%
YTD
9.64%
6M
9.87%
1Y
23.89%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
13.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKF vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BKF
iShares MSCI BRIC ETF
-7.90%22.30%9.24%1.27%-21.78%-11.87%16.52%22.93%-13.80%41.80%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
9.64%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BKF and DGRO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2014

0.55

The correlation between BKF and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BKF vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BKF
DGRO

Financial Services

23.7%
21.2%

Consumer Cyclical

19.5%
5.7%

Communication Services

12.6%
0.1%

Technology

7.9%
19.4%

Basic Materials

7.3%
2.5%

Energy

7.2%
5.6%

Industrials

7.2%
10.8%

Healthcare

5.2%
16.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
11.5%

Utilities

3.9%
6.9%

Real Estate

1.3%

-

Financial Services

BKF
23.7%
DGRO
21.2%

Consumer Cyclical

BKF
19.5%
DGRO
5.7%

Communication Services

BKF
12.6%
DGRO
0.1%

Technology

BKF
7.9%
DGRO
19.4%

Basic Materials

BKF
7.3%
DGRO
2.5%

Energy

BKF
7.2%
DGRO
5.6%

Industrials

BKF
7.2%
DGRO
10.8%

Healthcare

BKF
5.2%
DGRO
16.4%

Consumer Defensive

BKF
4.2%
DGRO
11.5%

Utilities

BKF
3.9%
DGRO
6.9%

Real Estate

BKF
1.3%
DGRO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKF vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKF
BKF Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
BKF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKF Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
BKF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKF Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKF vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI BRIC ETF (BKF) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKFDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.46

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

3.71

-3.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.19

14.33

-14.14

BKF vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKF Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKF and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKFDGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

2.53

-2.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

0.78

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.81

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

0.77

-0.77

Drawdowns

BKF vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKF drawdown since its inception was -70.29%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKF and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKFDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.29%

-35.10%

-35.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.43%

-6.47%

-6.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.60%

-14.03%

-4.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.94%

-19.31%

-25.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.20%

-35.10%

-14.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.41%

0.00%

-25.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.11%

-3.44%

-24.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.16%

1.67%

+3.49%

Volatility

BKF vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI BRIC ETF (BKF) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.24%. This indicates that BKF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKFDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.44%

2.24%

+3.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.40%

6.94%

+5.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.53%

9.49%

+6.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.51%

13.82%

+7.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.77%

16.62%

+5.15%

BKF vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKF has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKF vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

BKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, which matches DGRO's 1.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKF
iShares MSCI BRIC ETF
1.95%1.79%2.37%1.68%2.04%2.93%1.02%1.66%2.33%1.51%1.82%3.15%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.94%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKF and DGRO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKF has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to DGRO (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKF dropped -70.29% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.34% vs 4.94% for BKF. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.34% return vs 4.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for BKF.

BKF and DGRO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.95%.

BKF is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. BKF tracks MSCI BRIC Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for BKF and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKF and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer