BKCI vs. USFR
BKCI (BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF) and USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - BKCI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while USFR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. BKCI is actively managed, while USFR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BKCI returned 4.75%/yr vs 4.72%/yr for USFR. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. BKCI charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USFR.
Performance
BKCI vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKCI achieves a 2.60% return, which is significantly higher than USFR's 1.78% return.
BKCI
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 2.60%
- 6M
- 2.54%
- 1Y
- 7.68%
- 3Y*
- 4.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 3.97%
- 3Y*
- 4.72%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- 2.43%
BKCI vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKCI BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF | 2.60% | 9.94% | -2.44% | 20.27% | -20.26% | 0.38% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 1.78% | 4.23% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 1.98% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKCI and USFR is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021 | -0.02 |
The correlation between BKCI and USFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKCI vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
BKCI
USFR
BKCI vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF (BKCI) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BKCI | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -14.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -49.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 13.24 | -12.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 200.29 | -199.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.15 | 775.73 | -773.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKCI vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKCI drawdown since its inception was -31.03%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCI and USFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKCI | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.03% | -1.36% | -29.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.30% | -0.02% | -11.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.02% | -0.06% | -19.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.95% | 0.00% | -1.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.31% | -0.15% | -9.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.58% | 0.01% | +3.57% |
Volatility
BKCI vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF (BKCI) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.08%. This indicates that BKCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKCI | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | 0.08% | +4.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.72% | 0.19% | +11.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.59% | 0.27% | +14.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 0.40% | +16.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 0.78% | +15.84% |
BKCI vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKCI has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKCI vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
BKCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than USFR's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKCI BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF | 1.35% | 1.39% | 0.78% | 0.73% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.91% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKCI and USFR have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BKCI has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to USFR (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKCI dropped -31.03% vs USFR's -1.36%.
On 3-year performance, BKCI leads with 4.75% vs 4.72% for USFR. On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BKCI has performed better with a 4.75% return vs 4.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BKCI.
USFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 1.35% for BKCI.
BKCI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while USFR is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BKCI and 0.15% for USFR.
USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.65 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BKCI and USFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer