PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKCI vs. DWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKCI vs. DWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF (BKCI) and SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF (DWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKCI achieves a 4.65% return, which is significantly lower than DWX's 10.64% return.


BKCI

1D
0.75%
1M
-0.02%
6M
2.02%
YTD
4.65%
1Y
10.75%
3Y*
6.03%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.68%

DWX

1D
-0.42%
1M
3.07%
6M
6.49%
YTD
10.64%
1Y
19.67%
3Y*
16.41%
5Y*
8.12%
10Y*
7.29%
ALL TIME*
2.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$307.88K$335.15K$368.96K
$956.39K$1.20M$907.10K

BKCI vs. DWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BKCI
BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF
4.65%9.94%-2.44%20.27%-20.26%0.38%
DWX
SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF
10.64%31.62%2.56%14.74%-12.99%2.29%

Correlation

The correlation between BKCI and DWX is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021

0.75

The correlation between BKCI and DWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

BKCI vs. DWX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BKCI
DWX

Technology

26.2%
2.9%

Healthcare

20.3%
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

14.8%
6.6%

Basic Materials

11.3%
2.1%

Industrials

9.8%
10.6%

Financial Services

4.4%
17.3%

Energy

4.4%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
13.1%

Real Estate

2.9%
10.2%

Communication Services

2.3%
12.1%

Utilities

-

10.6%

Technology

BKCI
26.2%
DWX
2.9%

Healthcare

BKCI
20.3%
DWX
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

BKCI
14.8%
DWX
6.6%

Basic Materials

BKCI
11.3%
DWX
2.1%

Industrials

BKCI
9.8%
DWX
10.6%

Financial Services

BKCI
4.4%
DWX
17.3%

Energy

BKCI
4.4%
DWX
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

BKCI
3.5%
DWX
13.1%

Real Estate

BKCI
2.9%
DWX
10.2%

Communication Services

BKCI
2.3%
DWX
12.1%

Utilities

BKCI

-

DWX
10.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKCI vs. DWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BKCI
BKCI Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
BKCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKCI Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
BKCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKCI Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

DWX
DWX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
DWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BKCI vs. DWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF (BKCI) and SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF (DWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BKCIDWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.33

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

2.30

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.27

6.96

-3.69

BKCI vs. DWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKCI Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the DWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKCI and DWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BKCI vs. DWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKCI drawdown since its inception was -31.03%, smaller than the maximum DWX drawdown of -66.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCI and DWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKCIDWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.03%

-66.86%

+35.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-8.59%

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.02%

-10.65%

-9.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-1.68%

+1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.12%

-14.02%

+4.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

2.83%

+0.46%

Volatility

BKCI vs. DWX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF (BKCI) has a higher volatility of 3.52% compared to SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF (DWX) at 2.85%. This indicates that BKCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKCIDWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

2.85%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.67%

9.22%

+2.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.47%

11.05%

+3.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.52%

12.25%

+4.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.52%

14.72%

+1.80%

BKCI vs. DWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKCI has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than DWX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKCI vs. DWX - Dividend Comparison

BKCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than DWX's 4.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKCI
BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF
1.33%1.39%0.78%0.73%0.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DWX
SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF
4.12%4.44%4.31%4.12%4.68%3.89%3.84%4.40%5.06%3.85%5.25%5.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKCI and DWX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKCI has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to DWX (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKCI dropped -31.03% vs DWX's -66.86%.

On 3-year performance, DWX leads with 16.41% vs 6.03% for BKCI. On fees, DWX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DWX has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DWX has performed better with a 16.41% return vs 6.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DWX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BKCI.

DWX has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 1.33% for BKCI.

They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BKCI and 0.45% for DWX.

DWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKCI and DWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer