BKCI vs. BKMS
BKCI (BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF) and BKMS (BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKCI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while BKMS is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by BNY Mellon. Both are actively managed. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BKCI charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BKMS.
Performance
BKCI vs. BKMS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BKCI
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- YTD
- 4.65%
- 1Y
- 10.75%
- 3Y*
- 6.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.68%
BKMS
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $307.88K | $335.15K | $368.96K | |
| $734.37K | $868.46K | $1.10M |
BKCI vs. BKMS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BKCI BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF | 1.29% |
BKMS BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF | 0.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKCI and BKMS is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKCI vs. BKMS — Risk / Return Rank
BKCI
BKMS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BKCI vs. BKMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF (BKCI) and BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF (BKMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BKCI | BKMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.27 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKCI vs. BKMS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKCI drawdown since its inception was -31.03%, which is greater than BKMS's maximum drawdown of -0.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCI and BKMS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKCI | BKMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.03% | -0.87% | -30.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -0.26% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.12% | -0.25% | -8.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | — | — |
Volatility
BKCI vs. BKMS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKCI | BKMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.52% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.67% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.47% | 1.29% | +13.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 1.29% | +15.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 1.29% | +15.23% |
BKCI vs. BKMS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKCI has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BKMS's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKCI vs. BKMS - Dividend Comparison
BKCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than BKMS's 1.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKCI BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF | 1.33% | 1.39% | 0.78% | 0.73% | 0.46% |
BKMS BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKCI and BKMS have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BKMS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKMS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BKCI.
BKMS has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 1.33% for BKCI.
BKCI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BKMS is Municipal Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BKCI and 0.35% for BKMS.
Find the right allocation for BKCI and BKMS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer