BKCH vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BKCH (Global X Blockchain ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKCH is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Global X, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. BKCH is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. Over the past year, BKCH returned 86.50% vs 4.60% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. BKCH charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

BKCH vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKCH achieves a 36.44% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.67% return.

BKCH

• 1D: -1.46%
• 1M: 5.62%
• YTD: 36.44%
• 6M: 9.64%
• 1Y: 86.50%
• 3Y*: 58.43%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 2.67%
• 6M: 2.74%
• 1Y: 4.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKCH vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BKCH Global X Blockchain ETF	36.44%	55.08%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.67%	2.91%

Correlation

The correlation between BKCH and RBIL is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025	-0.12

Return for Risk

BKCH vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKCH

BKCH Risk / Return Rank: 32
BKCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
BKCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
BKCH Omega Ratio Rank: 34
BKCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
BKCH Martin Ratio Rank: 23

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 98
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKCH vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BKCH	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	5.06	-3.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	8.01	-6.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	2.41	-1.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.55	17.11	-15.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.86	71.11	-68.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BKCH vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKCH Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 5.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKCH and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BKCH	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	5.06	-3.81
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	4.24	-4.21

Drawdowns

BKCH vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKCH drawdown since its inception was -91.80%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCH and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKCH	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.80%	-0.50%	-91.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.28%	-0.27%	-56.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-57.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.59%	-0.03%	-34.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-62.10%	-0.06%	-62.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.30%	0.06%	+30.24%

Volatility

BKCH vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) has a higher volatility of 17.28% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.30%. This indicates that BKCH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKCH	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.28%	0.30%	+16.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.28%	0.79%	+50.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.80%	0.92%	+68.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	75.40%	1.05%	+74.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	75.40%	1.05%	+74.35%

BKCH vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKCH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

BKCH vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

BKCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than RBIL's 4.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BKCH Global X Blockchain ETF	1.47%	2.00%	7.61%	2.33%	1.29%	4.28%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.60%	3.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKCH and RBIL in my portfolio?

BKCH and RBIL have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BKCH or RBIL?

BKCH has higher volatility (17.28%) compared to RBIL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKCH dropped -91.80% vs RBIL's -0.50%.

Which ETF is better, BKCH or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, BKCH leads with 86.50% vs 4.60% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BKCH or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, BKCH has performed better with a 86.50% return vs 4.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKCH or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BKCH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKCH or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 1.47% for BKCH.

What is the main difference between BKCH and RBIL?

BKCH is categorized as Technology Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Global X and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BKCH and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.06 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.