BKCH vs. BETE
BKCH (Global X Blockchain ETF) and BETE (Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKCH is a Blockchain fund tracking the Solactive Blockchain Index, while BETE is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares. BKCH is passively managed, while BETE is actively managed. Over the past year, BKCH returned 23.59% vs -47.64% for BETE. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BKCH charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BETE.
Performance
BKCH vs. BETE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKCH achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly higher than BETE's -33.49% return.
BKCH
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- 6M
- -3.07%
- YTD
- 6.75%
- 1Y
- 23.59%
- 3Y*
- 30.82%
- 5Y*
- -5.83%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -3.79%
BETE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 7.02%
- 6M
- -18.35%
- YTD
- -33.49%
- 1Y
- -47.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $91.14K | $81.40K | $93.13K | |
| $2.64M | $3.41M | $7.65M |
BKCH vs. BETE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BKCH Global X Blockchain ETF | 6.75% | 27.14% | 18.81% | 101.61% |
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF | -33.49% | -8.17% | 66.02% | 36.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKCH and BETE is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023 | 0.67 |
The correlation between BKCH and BETE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKCH vs. BETE — Risk / Return Rank
BKCH
BETE
BKCH vs. BETE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) and Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BKCH | BETE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.86 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | -0.77 | +1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.70 | -1.16 | +1.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKCH vs. BETE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKCH drawdown since its inception was -91.80%, which is greater than BETE's maximum drawdown of -61.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCH and BETE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKCH | BETE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.80% | -61.75% | -30.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.28% | -61.75% | +5.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.82% | -56.39% | +7.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.52% | -23.54% | -37.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.88% | 40.93% | -7.05% |
Volatility
BKCH vs. BETE - Volatility Comparison
Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) has a higher volatility of 25.51% compared to Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) at 9.58%. This indicates that BKCH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BETE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKCH | BETE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.51% | 9.58% | +15.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.54% | 38.07% | +15.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.14% | 55.09% | +18.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.43% | 55.93% | +19.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.58% | 55.93% | +19.65% |
BKCH vs. BETE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKCH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BETE's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKCH vs. BETE - Dividend Comparison
BKCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than BETE's 63.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF | 63.80% | 68.22% | 15.22% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BKCH Global X Blockchain ETF | 1.79% | 2.00% | 7.61% | 2.33% | 1.29% | 4.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKCH and BETE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BKCH has higher volatility (25.51%) compared to BETE (9.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKCH dropped -91.80% vs BETE's -61.75%.
On 1-year performance, BKCH leads with 23.59% vs -47.64% for BETE. On fees, BKCH is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, BETE has been the lower-risk option at 9.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BKCH has performed better with a 23.59% return vs -47.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKCH is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BETE.
BETE has the higher dividend yield at 63.80%, compared with 1.79% for BKCH.
BKCH is categorized as Blockchain, while BETE is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BKCH and 0.95% for BETE.
BKCH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.32 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BKCH and BETE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer