BKCG vs. BKDV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BKCG (BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF) and BKDV (BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while BKDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BKCG returned 13.13% vs 30.07% for BKDV. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BKCG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for BKDV.

Performance

BKCG vs. BKDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF (BKCG) and BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKCG achieves a 6.03% return, which is significantly lower than BKDV's 17.20% return.

BKCG

• 1D: 1.88%
• 1M: 2.24%
• 6M: 4.12%
• YTD: 6.03%
• 1Y: 13.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.01%

BKDV

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: 0.92%
• 6M: 12.24%
• YTD: 17.20%
• 1Y: 30.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BKCG BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF	$101.82K	$84.42K	$71.56K
BKDV BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF	$14.15M	$13.74M	$12.33M

BKCG vs. BKDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BKCG BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF	6.03%	20.29%
BKDV BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF	17.20%	16.56%

Correlation

The correlation between BKCG and BKDV is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2025	0.66

The correlation between BKCG and BKDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

BKCG vs. BKDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BKCG	BKDV
Technology	33.5%	16.0%
Financial Services	19.4%	21.9%
Communication Services	10.8%	5.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	9.9%
Healthcare	6.9%	14.5%
Industrials	5.5%	11.8%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	7.5%
Basic Materials	-	3.4%
Energy	-	7.0%
Real Estate	-	1.1%
Utilities	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

BKCG vs. BKDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BKCG

BKCG Risk / Return Rank: 32
BKCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
BKCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
BKCG Omega Ratio Rank: 30
BKCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
BKCG Martin Ratio Rank: 36

BKDV

BKDV Risk / Return Rank: 91
BKDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
BKDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
BKDV Omega Ratio Rank: 90
BKDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
BKDV Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BKCG vs. BKDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF (BKCG) and BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BKCG	BKDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	2.34	-1.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.19	3.27	-2.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.42	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.94	4.29	-3.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.58	16.39	-12.82

BKCG vs. BKDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKCG Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the BKDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKCG and BKDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BKCG vs. BKDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKCG drawdown since its inception was -12.12%, smaller than the maximum BKDV drawdown of -15.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCG and BKDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKCG	BKDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.12%	-15.49%	+3.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.12%	-6.65%	-5.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	0.00%	-0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.06%	-2.24%	+0.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.20%	1.74%	+1.46%

Volatility

BKCG vs. BKDV - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF (BKCG) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) at 2.93%. This indicates that BKCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKCG	BKDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.02%	2.93%	+1.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.39%	9.30%	+2.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.17%	12.28%	+1.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.85%	15.39%	+2.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.85%	15.39%	+2.46%

BKCG vs. BKDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKCG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BKDV's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

BKCG vs. BKDV - Dividend Comparison

BKCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, more than BKDV's 0.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BKCG BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF	0.60%	0.45%	0.00%
BKDV BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF	0.53%	0.62%	0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKCG and BKDV in my portfolio?

BKCG and BKDV have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BKCG or BKDV?

BKCG has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to BKDV (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKCG dropped -12.12% vs BKDV's -15.49%.

Which ETF is better, BKCG or BKDV?

On 1-year performance, BKDV leads with 30.07% vs 13.13% for BKCG. On fees, BKCG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, BKDV has been the lower-risk option at 2.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BKCG or BKDV?

Over the 1-year period, BKDV has performed better with a 30.07% return vs 13.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKCG or BKDV?

BKCG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BKDV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKCG or BKDV?

BKCG has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.53% for BKDV.

What is the main difference between BKCG and BKDV?

BKCG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BKDV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BKCG and 0.60% for BKDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BKDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.