BKCC.TO vs. EQCC.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BKCC.TO (Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF) and EQCC.TO (Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BKCC.TO returned 41.73% vs 28.46% for EQCC.TO. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BKCC.TO charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for EQCC.TO.

Performance

BKCC.TO vs. EQCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF (BKCC.TO) and Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF (EQCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKCC.TO achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly higher than EQCC.TO's 12.84% return.

BKCC.TO

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 3.92%
• YTD: 14.24%
• 6M: 18.13%
• 1Y: 41.73%
• 3Y*: 22.19%
• 5Y*: 10.06%
• 10Y*: 9.35%

EQCC.TO

• 1D: 2.44%
• 1M: 7.82%
• YTD: 12.84%
• 6M: 12.97%
• 1Y: 28.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKCC.TO vs. EQCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BKCC.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF	14.24%	28.05%	14.01%
EQCC.TO Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF	12.84%	13.50%	11.68%

Correlation

The correlation between BKCC.TO and EQCC.TO is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2024	0.27

Return for Risk

BKCC.TO vs. EQCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKCC.TO

BKCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 94
BKCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
BKCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
BKCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 96
BKCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
BKCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 94

EQCC.TO

EQCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 81
EQCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
EQCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
EQCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 90
EQCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
EQCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKCC.TO vs. EQCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF (BKCC.TO) and Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF (EQCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BKCC.TO	EQCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.06	2.51	+1.56
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.85	3.54	+2.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.80	1.58	+0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.75	3.96	+1.79
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	26.70	15.65	+11.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BKCC.TO vs. EQCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKCC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.06, which is higher than the EQCC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKCC.TO and EQCC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BKCC.TO	EQCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.06	2.51	+1.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	1.41	-1.41

Drawdowns

BKCC.TO vs. EQCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.18%, which is greater than EQCC.TO's maximum drawdown of -15.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCC.TO and EQCC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKCC.TO	EQCC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.18%	-15.94%	-25.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.30%	-7.32%	+0.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.16%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.02%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.18%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.42%	0.00%	-1.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.91%	-1.73%	-4.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.57%	1.85%	-0.28%

Volatility

BKCC.TO vs. EQCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF (BKCC.TO) is 3.59%, while Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF (EQCC.TO) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that BKCC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKCC.TO	EQCC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.59%	6.07%	-2.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.18%	9.27%	-0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.31%	11.56%	-1.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.99%	13.94%	-0.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.99%	13.94%	+3.05%

BKCC.TO vs. EQCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKCC.TO has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than EQCC.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

BKCC.TO vs. EQCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

BKCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.52%, more than EQCC.TO's 8.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BKCC.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF	9.52%	10.43%	12.30%	10.93%	8.23%	5.52%	5.92%	5.44%	6.24%	5.76%	5.79%	7.35%
EQCC.TO Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF	8.68%	9.43%	5.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKCC.TO and EQCC.TO in my portfolio?

BKCC.TO and EQCC.TO have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BKCC.TO or EQCC.TO?

On fees, EQCC.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKCC.TO or EQCC.TO?

EQCC.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for BKCC.TO.

What is the main difference between BKCC.TO and EQCC.TO?

Their fees differ too: 0.84% for BKCC.TO and 0.65% for EQCC.TO.