BKCC.TO vs. BANK.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF (BKCC.TO) and Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund (BANK.TO).
BKCC.TO and BANK.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BKCC.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on May 16, 2011. BANK.TO is a passively managed fund by Evolve that tracks the performance of the Solactive Canadian Core Financials Equal Weight Index. It was launched on Feb 1, 2022.
Performance
BKCC.TO vs. BANK.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BKCC.TO vs. BANK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKCC.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF | 0.86% | 28.05% | 17.14% | 5.41% | -16.71% |
BANK.TO Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund | -2.91% | 41.00% | 27.90% | 16.23% | -20.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKCC.TO achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly higher than BANK.TO's -2.91% return.
BKCC.TO
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 0.86%
- 6M
- 10.61%
- 1Y
- 33.59%
- 3Y*
- 16.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.57%
- 10Y*
- 8.51%
BANK.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.04%
- YTD
- -2.91%
- 6M
- 11.86%
- 1Y
- 36.24%
- 3Y*
- 24.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BKCC.TO vs. BANK.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKCC.TO has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than BANK.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BKCC.TO vs. BANK.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BKCC.TO
BANK.TO
BKCC.TO vs. BANK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF (BKCC.TO) and Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund (BANK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BKCC.TO | BANK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.94 | 2.68 | +0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.88 | 3.35 | +0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.52 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.43 | 3.53 | +0.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.46 | 14.43 | +4.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKCC.TO | BANK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.94 | 2.68 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | 0.79 | -0.79 |
Correlation
The correlation between BKCC.TO and BANK.TO is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BKCC.TO vs. BANK.TO - Dividend Comparison
BKCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.64%, less than BANK.TO's 14.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKCC.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF | 9.64% | 10.43% | 12.30% | 10.93% | 8.23% | 5.52% | 5.92% | 5.44% | 6.24% | 5.76% | 5.79% | 7.35% |
BANK.TO Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund | 14.81% | 13.73% | 15.28% | 13.60% | 10.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BKCC.TO vs. BANK.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.33%, which is greater than BANK.TO's maximum drawdown of -29.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCC.TO and BANK.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKCC.TO | BANK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.33% | -29.03% | -71.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.71% | -10.61% | +2.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -7.32% | -92.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -9.16% | -90.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 2.60% | -0.75% |
Volatility
BKCC.TO vs. BANK.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF (BKCC.TO) is 5.34%, while Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund (BANK.TO) has a volatility of 5.87%. This indicates that BKCC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BANK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BKCC.TO | BANK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.34% | 5.87% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.22% | 9.35% | -1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.49% | 13.60% | -2.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.37% | 15.64% | -2.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 15.64% | +1.33% |