EQCC.TO vs. HBIL.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF (EQCC.TO) and Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO).

EQCC.TO and HBIL.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EQCC.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on May 28, 2024. HBIL.TO is an actively managed fund by Hamilton Capital. It was launched on Sep 12, 2024.

Performance

EQCC.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF (EQCC.TO) and Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EQCC.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EQCC.TO Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF	-0.75%	13.50%	7.21%
HBIL.TO Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged)	-0.05%	3.05%	-1.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQCC.TO achieves a -0.75% return, which is significantly lower than HBIL.TO's -0.05% return.

EQCC.TO

• 1D: 1.83%
• 1M: -5.62%
• YTD: -0.75%
• 6M: 2.42%
• 1Y: 13.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HBIL.TO

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -0.95%
• YTD: -0.05%
• 6M: 0.35%
• 1Y: 1.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQCC.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQCC.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than HBIL.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.

EQCC.TO

Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF

HBIL.TO

Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged)

Return for Risk

EQCC.TO vs. HBIL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQCC.TO

EQCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 45
EQCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
EQCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
EQCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 58
EQCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
EQCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 44

HBIL.TO

HBIL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 45
HBIL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
HBIL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
HBIL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 40
HBIL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
HBIL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQCC.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF (EQCC.TO) and Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EQCC.TO	HBIL.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	0.85	-0.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.13	1.19	-0.07
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.16	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.01	1.33	-0.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.29	3.88	+0.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EQCC.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQCC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is comparable to the HBIL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQCC.TO and HBIL.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EQCC.TO	HBIL.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83	0.85	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.98	0.49	+0.49

Correlation

The correlation between EQCC.TO and HBIL.TO is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

EQCC.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Dividend Comparison

EQCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.84%, more than HBIL.TO's 6.67% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
EQCC.TO Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF	8.84%	9.43%	5.38%
HBIL.TO Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged)	6.67%	7.49%	2.58%

Drawdowns

EQCC.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.94%, which is greater than HBIL.TO's maximum drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQCC.TO and HBIL.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EQCC.TO	HBIL.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.94%	-1.69%	-14.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.24%	-1.30%	-10.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.62%	-0.95%	-4.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.75%	-0.48%	-1.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.89%	0.45%	+2.44%

Volatility

EQCC.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF (EQCC.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO) at 0.72%. This indicates that EQCC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HBIL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EQCC.TO	HBIL.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.52%	0.72%	+3.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.68%	1.14%	+6.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.94%	1.86%	+14.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.63%	2.06%	+11.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.63%	2.06%	+11.57%