BKAG vs. BEDY

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF (BKAG) and BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (BEDY).

BKAG and BEDY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BKAG is a passively managed fund by BNY Mellon that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Aggregate Total Return Index. It was launched on Apr 24, 2020. BEDY is an actively managed fund by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Dec 8, 2025.

Performance

BKAG vs. BEDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF (BKAG) and BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (BEDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BKAG vs. BEDY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BKAG BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF	0.16%	0.35%
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	3.56%	1.62%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKAG achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than BEDY's 3.56% return.

BKAG

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -1.30%
• YTD: 0.16%
• 6M: 0.86%
• 1Y: 4.03%
• 3Y*: 3.59%
• 5Y*: 0.21%
• 10Y*: —

BEDY

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: -3.21%
• YTD: 3.56%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKAG vs. BEDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKAG has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than BEDY's 0.50% expense ratio.

BEDY

BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF

BKAG

BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF

Return for Risk

BKAG vs. BEDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKAG

BKAG Risk / Return Rank: 50
BKAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
BKAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
BKAG Omega Ratio Rank: 39
BKAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
BKAG Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKAG vs. BEDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF (BKAG) and BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (BEDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BKAG	BEDY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.74	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.87	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BKAG	BEDY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.01	1.45	-1.45

Correlation

The correlation between BKAG and BEDY is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BKAG vs. BEDY - Dividend Comparison

BKAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, more than BEDY's 2.14% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BKAG BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF	4.27%	4.17%	4.26%	3.33%	2.49%	1.55%	1.16%
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	2.14%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

BKAG vs. BEDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKAG drawdown since its inception was -18.53%, which is greater than BEDY's maximum drawdown of -6.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKAG and BEDY.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKAG	BEDY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.53%	-6.25%	-12.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.51%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.45%	-3.99%	+1.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.26%	-1.55%	-5.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.90%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BKAG	BEDY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.72%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.71%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.37%	12.42%	-8.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.99%	12.42%	-6.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.59%	12.42%	-6.83%