BJUL vs. NAPR
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (BJUL) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR).
BJUL and NAPR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BJUL is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Aug 28, 2018. NAPR is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 31, 2020. Both BJUL and NAPR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BJUL vs. NAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BJUL vs. NAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July | -2.12% | 13.93% | 18.41% | 21.73% | -7.38% | 10.77% | 31.22% |
NAPR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April | 1.71% | 6.56% | 13.29% | 30.60% | -12.13% | 9.09% | 15.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BJUL achieves a -2.12% return, which is significantly lower than NAPR's 1.71% return.
BJUL
- 1D
- 2.07%
- 1M
- -2.94%
- YTD
- -2.12%
- 6M
- 0.05%
- 1Y
- 15.08%
- 3Y*
- 15.00%
- 5Y*
- 9.88%
- 10Y*
- —
NAPR
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 1.71%
- 6M
- 3.74%
- 1Y
- 14.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.94%
- 5Y*
- 8.69%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BJUL vs. NAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BJUL and NAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Return for Risk
BJUL vs. NAPR — Risk / Return Rank
BJUL
NAPR
BJUL vs. NAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (BJUL) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BJUL | NAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 1.51 | -0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.78 | 2.43 | -0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.52 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 1.93 | -0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.36 | 14.15 | -4.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BJUL | NAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 1.51 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.77 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.95 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between BJUL and NAPR is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BJUL vs. NAPR - Dividend Comparison
Neither BJUL nor NAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BJUL vs. NAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BJUL drawdown since its inception was -24.03%, which is greater than NAPR's maximum drawdown of -16.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BJUL and NAPR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BJUL | NAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.03% | -16.53% | -7.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.03% | -7.53% | -1.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.06% | -16.53% | +2.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.45% | 0.00% | -3.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.55% | -2.34% | -0.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 1.03% | +0.63% |
Volatility
BJUL vs. NAPR - Volatility Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (BJUL) has a higher volatility of 3.83% compared to Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) at 0.65%. This indicates that BJUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BJUL | NAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.83% | 0.65% | +3.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.97% | 2.23% | +3.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.89% | 9.65% | +3.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.57% | 11.30% | +0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.77% | 10.71% | +3.06% |