PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BJUL vs. KAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BJUL vs. KAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (BJUL) and Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BJUL vs. KAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BJUL
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July
-2.12%13.93%18.41%21.73%-7.38%10.77%31.22%
KAPR
Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April
3.19%7.42%12.10%15.36%-8.14%2.48%21.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BJUL achieves a -2.12% return, which is significantly lower than KAPR's 3.19% return.


BJUL

1D
2.07%
1M
-2.94%
YTD
-2.12%
6M
0.05%
1Y
15.08%
3Y*
15.00%
5Y*
9.88%
10Y*

KAPR

1D
0.62%
1M
1.14%
YTD
3.19%
6M
5.99%
1Y
17.50%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BJUL vs. KAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BJUL and KAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

BJUL vs. KAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BJUL
BJUL Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
BJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
BJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

KAPR
KAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
KAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
KAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
KAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
KAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BJUL vs. KAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (BJUL) and Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BJULKAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.18

1.72

-0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.78

2.47

-0.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.42

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

2.10

-0.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.36

12.86

-3.50

BJUL vs. KAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BJUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the KAPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BJUL and KAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BJULKAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

1.72

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.51

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.73

-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between BJUL and KAPR is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BJUL vs. KAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither BJUL nor KAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BJUL vs. KAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BJUL drawdown since its inception was -24.03%, which is greater than KAPR's maximum drawdown of -16.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BJUL and KAPR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BJULKAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.03%

-16.91%

-7.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-8.39%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.06%

-16.91%

+2.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.45%

0.00%

-3.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.55%

-4.02%

+1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

1.37%

+0.29%

Volatility

BJUL vs. KAPR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (BJUL) has a higher volatility of 3.83% compared to Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR) at 1.70%. This indicates that BJUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BJULKAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

1.70%

+2.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.97%

3.93%

+2.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.89%

10.19%

+2.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.57%

11.77%

-0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.77%

11.72%

+2.05%