BJUL vs. FBUF

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

BJUL (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July) and FBUF (Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. BJUL is passively managed, while FBUF is actively managed. Over the past year, BJUL returned 16.08% vs 18.17% for FBUF. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BJUL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for FBUF.

Performance

BJUL vs. FBUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (BJUL) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BJUL achieves a 9.42% return, which is significantly higher than FBUF's 8.39% return.

BJUL

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: 2.63%
• 6M: 8.59%
• YTD: 9.42%
• 1Y: 16.08%
• 3Y*: 16.08%
• 5Y*: 11.74%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.16%

FBUF

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 3.55%
• 6M: 7.18%
• YTD: 8.39%
• 1Y: 18.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July	$791.36K	$3.32M	$1.95M
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	$211.74K	$183.32K	$255.79K

BJUL vs. FBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July	9.42%	13.93%	11.45%
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	8.39%	14.01%	10.55%

Correlation

The correlation between BJUL and FBUF is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2024	0.91

The correlation between BJUL and FBUF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BJUL vs. FBUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BJUL

BJUL Risk / Return Rank: 84
BJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
BJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
BJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 88
BJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
BJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 89

FBUF

FBUF Risk / Return Rank: 84
FBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 87
FBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BJUL vs. FBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (BJUL) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BJUL	FBUF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	2.18	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	2.92	+0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.42	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.99	3.25	-0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.18	13.57	+1.61

BJUL vs. FBUF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the FBUF Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BJUL and FBUF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BJUL vs. FBUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BJUL drawdown since its inception was -24.03%, which is greater than FBUF's maximum drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BJUL and FBUF.

Drawdown Indicators

	BJUL	FBUF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.03%	-11.09%	-12.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.40%	-5.61%	+0.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.45%	-1.34%	-1.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.06%	1.34%	-0.28%

Volatility

BJUL vs. FBUF - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (BJUL) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) have volatilities of 2.83% and 2.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BJUL	FBUF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.83%	2.80%	+0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.95%	6.40%	-0.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.49%	8.45%	-0.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.65%	9.65%	+2.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.54%	9.65%	+3.89%

BJUL vs. FBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FBUF's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

BJUL vs. FBUF - Dividend Comparison

BJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	0.57%	0.64%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BJUL and FBUF in my portfolio?

BJUL and FBUF have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BJUL or FBUF?

BJUL has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to FBUF (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BJUL dropped -24.03% vs FBUF's -11.09%.

Which ETF is better, BJUL or FBUF?

On 1-year performance, FBUF leads with 18.17% vs 16.08% for BJUL. On fees, FBUF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BJUL or FBUF?

Over the 1-year period, FBUF has performed better with a 18.17% return vs 16.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BJUL or FBUF?

FBUF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BJUL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BJUL or FBUF?

FBUF has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.00% for BJUL.

What is the main difference between BJUL and FBUF?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BJUL and 0.48% for FBUF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBUF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.