PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BJBHX vs. ABEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BJBHX vs. ABEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Global High Income Fund (BJBHX) and abrdn Emerging Markets Fund (ABEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BJBHX achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than ABEMX's 19.82% return. Over the past 10 years, BJBHX has underperformed ABEMX with an annualized return of 4.17%, while ABEMX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.47% annualized return.


BJBHX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.92%
6M
0.53%
YTD
1.55%
1Y
4.19%
3Y*
7.47%
5Y*
2.78%
10Y*
4.17%
ALL TIME*
6.08%

ABEMX

1D
4.45%
1M
-3.58%
6M
10.63%
YTD
19.82%
1Y
41.51%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
8.47%
ALL TIME*
7.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BJBHX vs. ABEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BJBHX
abrdn Global High Income Fund
1.55%6.99%7.69%12.32%-12.63%2.98%5.32%14.32%-5.59%8.68%
ABEMX
abrdn Emerging Markets Fund
19.82%32.43%3.98%6.67%-26.23%7.15%27.65%20.42%-14.65%30.25%

Correlation

The correlation between BJBHX and ABEMX is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2007

0.47

The correlation between BJBHX and ABEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BJBHX vs. ABEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BJBHX
BJBHX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
BJBHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BJBHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
BJBHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BJBHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BJBHX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

ABEMX
ABEMX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ABEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ABEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BJBHX vs. ABEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Global High Income Fund (BJBHX) and abrdn Emerging Markets Fund (ABEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BJBHXABEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.31

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

2.69

-1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.69

8.64

-2.95

BJBHX vs. ABEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BJBHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the ABEMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BJBHX and ABEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BJBHX vs. ABEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BJBHX drawdown since its inception was -28.45%, smaller than the maximum ABEMX drawdown of -54.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BJBHX and ABEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BJBHXABEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.45%

-54.52%

+26.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.48%

-14.58%

+12.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.57%

-18.62%

+14.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.77%

-36.56%

+18.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.82%

-38.44%

+15.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-10.78%

+9.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.24%

-13.04%

+9.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

4.53%

-3.81%

Volatility

BJBHX vs. ABEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for abrdn Global High Income Fund (BJBHX) is 0.61%, while abrdn Emerging Markets Fund (ABEMX) has a volatility of 10.52%. This indicates that BJBHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BJBHXABEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.61%

10.52%

-9.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.28%

22.66%

-20.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.83%

24.52%

-21.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.38%

19.81%

-15.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.03%

19.20%

-14.17%

BJBHX vs. ABEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BJBHX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is lower than ABEMX's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

BJBHX vs. ABEMX - Dividend Comparison

BJBHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.04%, more than ABEMX's 5.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABEMX
abrdn Emerging Markets Fund
5.10%6.11%0.99%1.42%1.82%22.95%0.68%1.85%1.57%1.32%1.23%2.47%
BJBHX
abrdn Global High Income Fund
6.04%6.36%6.08%5.02%7.45%4.60%4.35%5.37%5.62%3.69%4.97%6.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


BJBHX and ABEMX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABEMX has higher volatility (10.52%) compared to BJBHX (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BJBHX dropped -28.45% vs ABEMX's -54.52%.

ABEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BJBHX and ABEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer