BJAN vs. SCHE
BJAN (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January) and SCHE (Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BJAN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500, while SCHE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BJAN returned 10.40%/yr vs 4.83%/yr for SCHE. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BJAN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for SCHE.
Performance
BJAN vs. SCHE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BJAN achieves a 6.13% return, which is significantly lower than SCHE's 10.50% return.
BJAN
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 6.13%
- 6M
- 7.42%
- 1Y
- 19.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.36%
- 5Y*
- 10.40%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHE
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- 10.50%
- 6M
- 12.18%
- 1Y
- 26.49%
- 3Y*
- 16.79%
- 5Y*
- 4.83%
- 10Y*
- 9.02%
BJAN vs. SCHE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BJAN Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January | 6.13% | 14.81% | 17.36% | 23.66% | -11.40% | 13.86% | 12.54% | 22.27% |
SCHE Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 10.50% | 26.54% | 10.60% | 8.93% | -17.84% | -0.65% | 14.49% | 20.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between BJAN and SCHE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2019 | 0.64 |
The correlation between BJAN and SCHE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
BJAN vs. SCHE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BJAN
SCHE
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BJAN
SCHE
Financial Services
BJAN
SCHE
Communication Services
BJAN
SCHE
Consumer Cyclical
BJAN
SCHE
Healthcare
BJAN
SCHE
Industrials
BJAN
SCHE
Consumer Defensive
BJAN
SCHE
Energy
BJAN
SCHE
Utilities
BJAN
SCHE
Real Estate
BJAN
SCHE
Basic Materials
BJAN
SCHE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BJAN vs. SCHE — Risk / Return Rank
BJAN
SCHE
BJAN vs. SCHE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN) and Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BJAN | SCHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.27 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 2.18 | +0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.94 | 7.70 | +7.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BJAN vs. SCHE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BJAN drawdown since its inception was -26.86%, smaller than the maximum SCHE drawdown of -36.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BJAN and SCHE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BJAN | SCHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.86% | -36.20% | +9.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.27% | -11.29% | +5.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.81% | -17.08% | +3.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.38% | -33.31% | +15.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -2.66% | +1.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.90% | -12.58% | +9.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.26% | 3.20% | -1.94% |
Volatility
BJAN vs. SCHE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN) is 2.23%, while Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE) has a volatility of 6.91%. This indicates that BJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BJAN | SCHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.23% | 6.91% | -4.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.34% | 14.48% | -8.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.87% | 16.97% | -9.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.99% | 17.79% | -5.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.06% | 19.49% | -5.43% |
BJAN vs. SCHE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHE's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
BJAN vs. SCHE - Dividend Comparison
BJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BJAN Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHE Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 2.61% | 2.88% | 3.03% | 3.83% | 2.88% | 2.86% | 2.09% | 3.27% | 2.64% | 2.31% | 2.27% | 2.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BJAN and SCHE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHE has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to BJAN (2.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BJAN dropped -26.86% vs SCHE's -36.20%.
On 5-year performance, BJAN leads with 10.40% vs 4.83% for SCHE. On fees, SCHE is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, BJAN has been the lower-risk option at 2.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BJAN has performed better with a 10.40% return vs 4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHE is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BJAN.
SCHE has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.00% for BJAN.
BJAN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SCHE is Emerging Markets Equities. BJAN tracks S&P 500, while SCHE tracks FTSE Emerging Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BJAN and 0.11% for SCHE.
BJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BJAN and SCHE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer