BJAN vs. PBFR
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR).
BJAN and PBFR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BJAN is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Dec 31, 2018. PBFR is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on Jun 11, 2024.
Performance
BJAN vs. PBFR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BJAN vs. PBFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BJAN Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January | -3.13% | 14.81% | 6.78% |
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF | -0.75% | 10.44% | 5.53% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BJAN achieves a -3.13% return, which is significantly lower than PBFR's -0.75% return.
BJAN
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- -3.75%
- YTD
- -3.13%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 14.36%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 9.11%
- 10Y*
- —
PBFR
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- YTD
- -0.75%
- 6M
- 1.42%
- 1Y
- 10.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BJAN vs. PBFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PBFR's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BJAN vs. PBFR — Risk / Return Rank
BJAN
PBFR
BJAN vs. PBFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BJAN | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.11 | 1.34 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.68 | 1.99 | -0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.35 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 1.84 | -0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.27 | 10.86 | -2.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BJAN | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 1.34 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 1.20 | -0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between BJAN and PBFR is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BJAN vs. PBFR - Dividend Comparison
BJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PBFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BJAN Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.66% |
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BJAN vs. PBFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BJAN drawdown since its inception was -26.86%, which is greater than PBFR's maximum drawdown of -8.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BJAN and PBFR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BJAN | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.86% | -8.50% | -18.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.38% | -6.15% | -3.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.49% | -1.56% | -2.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.97% | -0.68% | -2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 1.04% | +0.75% |
Volatility
BJAN vs. PBFR - Volatility Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN) has a higher volatility of 3.90% compared to PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR) at 2.42%. This indicates that BJAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BJAN | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.90% | 2.42% | +1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.18% | 3.46% | +2.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.95% | 8.18% | +4.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.00% | 7.13% | +4.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.19% | 7.13% | +7.06% |