PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIZD vs. PSCF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIZD vs. PSCF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF (PSCF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIZD achieves a -8.99% return, which is significantly lower than PSCF's 4.89% return. Over the past 10 years, BIZD has outperformed PSCF with an annualized return of 7.77%, while PSCF has yielded a comparatively lower 6.80% annualized return.


BIZD

1D
-2.28%
1M
-6.62%
YTD
-8.99%
6M
-10.20%
1Y
-12.94%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
4.03%
10Y*
7.77%

PSCF

1D
-1.78%
1M
-2.06%
YTD
4.89%
6M
5.56%
1Y
16.72%
3Y*
15.40%
5Y*
2.81%
10Y*
6.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIZD vs. PSCF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIZD
VanEck BDC Income ETF
-8.99%-4.96%15.63%27.02%-8.51%36.25%-7.12%30.87%-6.88%0.36%
PSCF
Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF
4.89%6.19%15.50%6.02%-19.34%27.82%-9.07%23.13%-8.43%6.71%

Correlation

The correlation between BIZD and PSCF is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2013

0.60

The correlation between BIZD and PSCF shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BIZD vs. PSCF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BIZD
PSCF

Financial Services

100.0%
66.9%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.3%

Real Estate

-

30.8%

Technology

-

1.9%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

BIZD
100.0%
PSCF
66.9%

Basic Materials

BIZD

-

PSCF

-

Communication Services

BIZD

-

PSCF

-

Consumer Cyclical

BIZD

-

PSCF

-

Consumer Defensive

BIZD

-

PSCF

-

Energy

BIZD

-

PSCF

-

Healthcare

BIZD

-

PSCF

-

Industrials

BIZD

-

PSCF
0.3%

Real Estate

BIZD

-

PSCF
30.8%

Technology

BIZD

-

PSCF
1.9%

Utilities

BIZD

-

PSCF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIZD vs. PSCF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIZD
BIZD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BIZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIZD Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BIZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIZD Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

PSCF
PSCF Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
PSCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCF Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCF Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIZD vs. PSCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF (PSCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIZDPSCFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.18

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

1.69

-2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.03

4.50

-5.53

BIZD vs. PSCF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIZD Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is lower than the PSCF Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIZD and PSCF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIZDPSCFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.72

0.97

-1.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.13

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.28

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.37

-0.07

Drawdowns

BIZD vs. PSCF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIZD drawdown since its inception was -55.44%, which is greater than PSCF's maximum drawdown of -45.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIZD and PSCF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIZDPSCFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.44%

-45.46%

-9.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.22%

-9.91%

-12.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.56%

-24.34%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

-36.77%

+13.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.44%

-45.46%

-9.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.27%

-4.29%

-14.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.72%

-8.59%

+1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.63%

3.72%

+8.91%

Volatility

BIZD vs. PSCF - Volatility Comparison

VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF (PSCF) have volatilities of 4.79% and 4.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIZDPSCFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.79%

4.63%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.77%

11.58%

+3.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.11%

17.42%

+0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.40%

22.47%

-5.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.74%

24.79%

-3.05%

BIZD vs. PSCF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIZD has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCF's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIZD vs. PSCF - Dividend Comparison

BIZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.87%, more than PSCF's 2.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIZD
VanEck BDC Income ETF
13.87%11.78%10.94%10.96%11.21%8.14%10.39%9.13%10.88%9.13%8.51%9.12%
PSCF
Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF
2.42%2.09%2.48%3.32%2.93%1.83%3.57%4.27%4.21%2.26%3.01%2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIZD and PSCF have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIZD has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to PSCF (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIZD dropped -55.44% vs PSCF's -45.46%.

On 10-year performance, BIZD leads with 7.77% vs 6.80% for PSCF. On fees, PSCF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PSCF has been the lower-risk option at 4.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BIZD has performed better with a 7.77% return vs 6.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSCF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BIZD.

BIZD has the higher dividend yield at 13.87%, compared with 2.42% for PSCF.

BIZD tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies Index, while PSCF tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BIZD and 0.29% for PSCF.

PSCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIZD and PSCF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer