BIZD vs. PSCF
BIZD (VanEck BDC Income ETF) and PSCF (Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - BIZD tracks the MVIS US Business Development Companies Index while PSCF tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BIZD returned 7.56%/yr vs 7.98%/yr for PSCF. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BIZD charges 12.86%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PSCF.
Performance
BIZD vs. PSCF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIZD achieves a -9.87% return, which is significantly lower than PSCF's 12.95% return. Over the past 10 years, BIZD has underperformed PSCF with an annualized return of 7.56%, while PSCF has yielded a comparatively higher 7.98% annualized return.
BIZD
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- -9.87%
- 6M
- -8.40%
- 1Y
- -12.75%
- 3Y*
- 5.35%
- 5Y*
- 3.92%
- 10Y*
- 7.56%
PSCF
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- 4.77%
- YTD
- 12.95%
- 6M
- 11.09%
- 1Y
- 22.91%
- 3Y*
- 19.88%
- 5Y*
- 4.52%
- 10Y*
- 7.98%
BIZD vs. PSCF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | -9.87% | -4.96% | 15.63% | 27.02% | -8.51% | 36.25% | -7.12% | 30.87% | -6.88% | 0.36% |
PSCF Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF | 12.95% | 6.19% | 15.50% | 6.02% | -19.34% | 27.82% | -9.07% | 23.13% | -8.43% | 6.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIZD and PSCF is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2013 | 0.60 |
The correlation between BIZD and PSCF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
BIZD vs. PSCF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BIZD
PSCF
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
BIZD
PSCF
Basic Materials
BIZD
-
PSCF
-
Communication Services
BIZD
-
PSCF
-
Consumer Cyclical
BIZD
-
PSCF
-
Consumer Defensive
BIZD
-
PSCF
-
Energy
BIZD
-
PSCF
-
Healthcare
BIZD
-
PSCF
-
Industrials
BIZD
-
PSCF
Real Estate
BIZD
-
PSCF
Technology
BIZD
-
PSCF
Utilities
BIZD
-
PSCF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIZD vs. PSCF — Risk / Return Rank
BIZD
PSCF
BIZD vs. PSCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF (PSCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BIZD | PSCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.24 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 2.32 | -2.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | 6.18 | -7.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BIZD vs. PSCF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIZD drawdown since its inception was -55.44%, which is greater than PSCF's maximum drawdown of -45.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIZD and PSCF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIZD | PSCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.44% | -45.46% | -9.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.22% | -9.91% | -12.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.56% | -24.34% | +1.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.91% | -36.77% | +13.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.44% | -45.46% | -9.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.05% | 0.00% | -20.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.76% | -8.57% | +1.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.30% | 3.71% | +9.59% |
Volatility
BIZD vs. PSCF - Volatility Comparison
VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF (PSCF) at 4.70%. This indicates that BIZD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIZD | PSCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.60% | 4.70% | +0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.19% | 11.99% | +3.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.50% | 17.54% | +0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.44% | 22.42% | -4.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.78% | 24.77% | -2.99% |
BIZD vs. PSCF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIZD has a 12.86% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCF's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
BIZD vs. PSCF - Dividend Comparison
BIZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.01%, more than PSCF's 2.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | 14.01% | 11.78% | 10.94% | 10.96% | 11.21% | 8.14% | 10.39% | 9.13% | 10.88% | 9.13% | 8.51% | 9.12% |
PSCF Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF | 2.22% | 2.09% | 2.48% | 3.32% | 2.93% | 1.83% | 3.57% | 4.27% | 4.21% | 2.26% | 3.01% | 2.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BIZD and PSCF have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIZD has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to PSCF (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIZD dropped -55.44% vs PSCF's -45.46%.
On 10-year performance, PSCF leads with 7.98% vs 7.56% for BIZD. On fees, PSCF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PSCF has been the lower-risk option at 4.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSCF has performed better with a 7.98% return vs 7.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSCF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 12.86% for BIZD.
BIZD has the higher dividend yield at 14.01%, compared with 2.22% for PSCF.
BIZD tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies Index, while PSCF tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 12.86% for BIZD and 0.29% for PSCF.
PSCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BIZD and PSCF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer