BIVRX vs. JAKRX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BIVRX (Invenomic Fund) and JAKRX (John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past year, BIVRX returned -10.04% vs 26.01% for JAKRX. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. BIVRX charges 2.48%/yr vs 1.91%/yr for JAKRX.

Performance

BIVRX vs. JAKRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invenomic Fund (BIVRX) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A (JAKRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIVRX achieves a -15.45% return, which is significantly lower than JAKRX's 12.80% return.

BIVRX

• 1D: -2.33%
• 1M: -8.20%
• YTD: -15.45%
• 6M: -10.79%
• 1Y: -10.04%
• 3Y*: -5.34%
• 5Y*: 5.72%
• 10Y*: —

JAKRX

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 1.00%
• YTD: 12.80%
• 6M: 13.69%
• 1Y: 26.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIVRX vs. JAKRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BIVRX Invenomic Fund	-15.45%	5.95%
JAKRX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A	12.80%	17.04%

Correlation

The correlation between BIVRX and JAKRX is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025	-0.18

Return for Risk

BIVRX vs. JAKRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIVRX

BIVRX Risk / Return Rank: 1
BIVRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BIVRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BIVRX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BIVRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BIVRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

JAKRX

JAKRX Risk / Return Rank: 93
JAKRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
JAKRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
JAKRX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
JAKRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
JAKRX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIVRX vs. JAKRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invenomic Fund (BIVRX) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A (JAKRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BIVRX	JAKRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.40	3.58	-3.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.45	5.11	-5.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.72	-0.77
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.47	5.14	-5.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.23	18.09	-19.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BIVRX vs. JAKRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIVRX Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the JAKRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIVRX and JAKRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BIVRX	JAKRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.40	3.58	-3.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	3.97	-3.27

Drawdowns

BIVRX vs. JAKRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIVRX drawdown since its inception was -21.14%, which is greater than JAKRX's maximum drawdown of -5.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIVRX and JAKRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BIVRX	JAKRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.14%	-5.16%	-15.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.70%	-5.16%	-15.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.14%	-0.66%	-20.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.06%	-0.80%	-5.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.93%	1.46%	+6.47%

Volatility

BIVRX vs. JAKRX - Volatility Comparison

Invenomic Fund (BIVRX) has a higher volatility of 12.21% compared to John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A (JAKRX) at 2.41%. This indicates that BIVRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAKRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BIVRX	JAKRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.21%	2.41%	+9.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.24%	5.86%	+14.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.31%	7.43%	+16.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.55%	7.29%	+10.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.57%	7.29%	+10.28%

BIVRX vs. JAKRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIVRX has a 2.48% expense ratio, which is higher than JAKRX's 1.91% expense ratio.

Dividends

BIVRX vs. JAKRX - Dividend Comparison

BIVRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than JAKRX's 7.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BIVRX Invenomic Fund	2.28%	1.93%	3.55%	20.26%	28.43%	3.00%	3.11%	3.21%	4.82%	1.21%
JAKRX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A	7.18%	8.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BIVRX and JAKRX in my portfolio?

BIVRX and JAKRX have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BIVRX or JAKRX?

BIVRX has higher volatility (12.21%) compared to JAKRX (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIVRX dropped -21.14% vs JAKRX's -5.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JAKRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.58 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.