BIVIX vs. LONGX
BIVIX (Invenomic Fund Institutional Class) and LONGX (Longboard Alternative Growth Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 5 years, BIVIX returned 10.42%/yr vs 5.02%/yr for LONGX. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. BIVIX charges 3.17%/yr vs 1.99%/yr for LONGX.
Performance
BIVIX vs. LONGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIVIX achieves a -15.76% return, which is significantly lower than LONGX's 13.22% return.
BIVIX
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- -15.76%
- 6M
- -13.67%
- 1Y
- -9.35%
- 3Y*
- -5.08%
- 5Y*
- 10.42%
- 10Y*
- —
LONGX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 13.22%
- 6M
- 11.21%
- 1Y
- 17.70%
- 3Y*
- 12.14%
- 5Y*
- 5.02%
- 10Y*
- 24.99%
BIVIX vs. LONGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIVIX Invenomic Fund Institutional Class | -15.76% | 4.63% | -8.81% | 16.80% | 50.01% | 63.81% | 11.46% | 11.59% | 3.68% | 8.93% |
LONGX Longboard Alternative Growth Fund | 13.22% | 1.49% | 14.95% | 5.64% | -13.21% | 13.89% | 27.70% | 13.82% | 270.32% | 9.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIVIX and LONGX is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017 | -0.08 |
The correlation between BIVIX and LONGX shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to -0.05 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIVIX vs. LONGX — Risk / Return Rank
BIVIX
LONGX
BIVIX vs. LONGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invenomic Fund Institutional Class (BIVIX) and Longboard Alternative Growth Fund (LONGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BIVIX | LONGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.28 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | 2.40 | -2.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.97 | 9.24 | -10.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BIVIX vs. LONGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIVIX drawdown since its inception was -26.95%, smaller than the maximum LONGX drawdown of -77.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIVIX and LONGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIVIX | LONGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.95% | -77.16% | +50.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.95% | -7.09% | -19.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.95% | -14.57% | -12.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.95% | -19.28% | -7.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -77.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.07% | 0.00% | -21.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.98% | -7.33% | +1.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.23% | 1.84% | +7.39% |
Volatility
BIVIX vs. LONGX - Volatility Comparison
Invenomic Fund Institutional Class (BIVIX) has a higher volatility of 13.91% compared to Longboard Alternative Growth Fund (LONGX) at 3.21%. This indicates that BIVIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LONGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIVIX | LONGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.91% | 3.21% | +10.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.70% | 8.51% | +14.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.89% | 10.89% | +16.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 11.90% | +5.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 137.76% | -120.26% |
BIVIX vs. LONGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIVIX has a 3.17% expense ratio, which is higher than LONGX's 1.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
BIVIX vs. LONGX - Dividend Comparison
BIVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, while LONGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIVIX Invenomic Fund Institutional Class | 2.61% | 2.20% | 3.95% | 20.15% | 27.91% | 16.08% | 3.15% | 3.19% | 4.79% | 1.21% | 0.00% |
LONGX Longboard Alternative Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.40% | 7.64% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.10% | 268.50% | 23.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BIVIX and LONGX have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIVIX has higher volatility (13.91%) compared to LONGX (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIVIX dropped -26.95% vs LONGX's -77.16%.
LONGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BIVIX and LONGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer