BIV vs. FMDE

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

BIV (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF) and FMDE (Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BIV is a Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. 5–10 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Bond Index, while FMDE is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. BIV is passively managed, while FMDE is actively managed. Over the past year, BIV returned 4.70% vs 17.86% for FMDE. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BIV charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for FMDE.

Performance

BIV vs. FMDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIV achieves a -0.67% return, which is significantly lower than FMDE's 8.21% return.

BIV

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.94%
• YTD: -0.67%
• 6M: -0.33%
• 1Y: 4.70%
• 3Y*: 4.27%
• 5Y*: 0.08%
• 10Y*: 1.83%

FMDE

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 1.08%
• YTD: 8.21%
• 6M: 8.53%
• 1Y: 17.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIV vs. FMDE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BIV Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF	-0.67%	8.52%	1.57%	4.78%
FMDE Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF	8.21%	12.19%	21.76%	9.09%

Correlation

The correlation between BIV and FMDE is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2023	0.25

Return for Risk

BIV vs. FMDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIV

BIV Risk / Return Rank: 34
BIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
BIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
BIV Omega Ratio Rank: 33
BIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
BIV Martin Ratio Rank: 32

FMDE

FMDE Risk / Return Rank: 45
FMDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FMDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
FMDE Omega Ratio Rank: 39
FMDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
FMDE Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIV vs. FMDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BIV	FMDE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	1.31	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	1.89	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.23	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.49	2.15	-0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.40	8.49	-4.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BIV vs. FMDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the FMDE Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIV and FMDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BIV	FMDE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18	1.31	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	1.28	-0.64

Drawdowns

BIV vs. FMDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIV drawdown since its inception was -18.95%, smaller than the maximum FMDE drawdown of -21.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIV and FMDE.

Drawdown Indicators

	BIV	FMDE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.95%	-21.10%	+2.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.18%	-8.33%	+5.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.95%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.46%	-2.19%	-0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.39%	-2.64%	-0.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.07%	2.11%	-1.04%

Volatility

BIV vs. FMDE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) is 1.35%, while Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE) has a volatility of 3.52%. This indicates that BIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BIV	FMDE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.35%	3.52%	-2.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.93%	10.03%	-7.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.00%	13.75%	-9.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.40%	16.15%	-9.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.51%	16.15%	-10.64%

BIV vs. FMDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FMDE's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BIV vs. FMDE - Dividend Comparison

BIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, more than FMDE's 1.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIV Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF	4.24%	4.01%	3.79%	3.09%	2.41%	3.42%	2.95%	2.75%	2.88%	2.69%	3.01%	3.02%
FMDE Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF	1.13%	1.23%	1.11%	0.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BIV and FMDE in my portfolio?

BIV and FMDE have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BIV or FMDE?

FMDE has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to BIV (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIV dropped -18.95% vs FMDE's -21.10%.

Which ETF is better, BIV or FMDE?

On 1-year performance, FMDE leads with 17.86% vs 4.70% for BIV. On fees, BIV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BIV has been the lower-risk option at 1.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BIV or FMDE?

Over the 1-year period, FMDE has performed better with a 17.86% return vs 4.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BIV or FMDE?

BIV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for FMDE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BIV or FMDE?

BIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 1.13% for FMDE.

What is the main difference between BIV and FMDE?

BIV is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while FMDE is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for BIV and 0.23% for FMDE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.