BITY vs. ISWN

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

BITY (Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF) and ISWN (Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BITY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify, while ISWN is a Options Trading fund tracking the S-Network International BlackSwan. BITY is actively managed, while ISWN is passively managed. Over the past year, BITY returned -43.57% vs 12.65% for ISWN. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BITY charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ISWN.

Performance

BITY vs. ISWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) and Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITY achieves a -26.11% return, which is significantly lower than ISWN's 4.88% return.

BITY

• 1D: -2.83%
• 1M: 2.10%
• 6M: -23.81%
• YTD: -26.11%
• 1Y: -43.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -26.39%

ISWN

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: -0.36%
• 6M: 1.64%
• YTD: 4.88%
• 1Y: 12.65%
• 3Y*: 8.59%
• 5Y*: -0.39%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 0.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF	$100.16K	$157.87K	$174.55K
ISWN Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF	$43.70K	$37.63K	$41.07K

BITY vs. ISWN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF	-26.11%	-7.84%
ISWN Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF	4.88%	11.79%

Correlation

The correlation between BITY and ISWN is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025	0.32

Return for Risk

BITY vs. ISWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BITY

BITY Risk / Return Rank: 1
BITY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BITY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BITY Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BITY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BITY Martin Ratio Rank: 1

ISWN

ISWN Risk / Return Rank: 41
ISWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
ISWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
ISWN Omega Ratio Rank: 41
ISWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
ISWN Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BITY vs. ISWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) and Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BITY	ISWN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.10	1.05	-2.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.66	1.54	-3.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	1.19	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.90	1.40	-2.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.40	4.25	-5.66

BITY vs. ISWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITY Sharpe Ratio is -1.10, which is lower than the ISWN Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITY and ISWN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BITY vs. ISWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITY drawdown since its inception was -50.87%, which is greater than ISWN's maximum drawdown of -32.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITY and ISWN.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITY	ISWN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.87%	-32.35%	-18.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.87%	-9.63%	-41.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.77%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.63%	-3.48%	-44.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.13%	-15.81%	-7.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.54%	3.17%	+29.37%

Volatility

BITY vs. ISWN - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) has a higher volatility of 9.22% compared to Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) at 3.96%. This indicates that BITY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BITY	ISWN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.22%	3.96%	+5.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.63%	11.24%	+20.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.58%	12.90%	+28.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.00%	11.92%	+27.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.00%	11.68%	+27.32%

BITY vs. ISWN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ISWN's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

BITY vs. ISWN - Dividend Comparison

BITY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.67%, more than ISWN's 2.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF	37.67%	21.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ISWN Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF	2.87%	2.89%	3.27%	2.91%	2.00%	0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BITY and ISWN in my portfolio?

BITY and ISWN have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BITY or ISWN?

BITY has higher volatility (9.22%) compared to ISWN (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITY dropped -50.87% vs ISWN's -32.35%.

Which ETF is better, BITY or ISWN?

On 1-year performance, ISWN leads with 12.65% vs -43.57% for BITY. On fees, ISWN is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, ISWN has been the lower-risk option at 3.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BITY or ISWN?

Over the 1-year period, ISWN has performed better with a 12.65% return vs -43.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BITY or ISWN?

ISWN is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BITY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BITY or ISWN?

BITY has the higher dividend yield at 37.67%, compared with 2.87% for ISWN.

What is the main difference between BITY and ISWN?

BITY is categorized as Derivative Income, while ISWN is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BITY and 0.49% for ISWN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ISWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.