BITY vs. AIVC
BITY (Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF) and AIVC (Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BITY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify, while AIVC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg AI Value Chain Index. BITY is actively managed, while AIVC is passively managed. Over the past year, BITY returned -37.35% vs 151.70% for AIVC. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BITY charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for AIVC.
Performance
BITY vs. AIVC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITY achieves a -23.09% return, which is significantly lower than AIVC's 79.45% return.
BITY
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- -19.63%
- YTD
- -23.09%
- 6M
- -26.69%
- 1Y
- -37.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIVC
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- 30.74%
- YTD
- 79.45%
- 6M
- 79.35%
- 1Y
- 151.70%
- 3Y*
- 51.42%
- 5Y*
- 20.46%
- 10Y*
- 17.12%
BITY vs. AIVC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF | -23.09% | -8.21% |
AIVC Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF | 79.45% | 56.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITY and AIVC is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITY vs. AIVC — Risk / Return Rank
BITY
AIVC
BITY vs. AIVC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) and Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BITY | AIVC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.69 | -0.84 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | 10.82 | -11.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | 36.63 | -38.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BITY | AIVC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.94 | 5.14 | -6.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.70 | 0.64 | -1.34 |
Drawdowns
BITY vs. AIVC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITY drawdown since its inception was -46.36%, smaller than the maximum AIVC drawdown of -56.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITY and AIVC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITY | AIVC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.36% | -56.11% | +9.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.36% | -14.11% | -32.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -32.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -53.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.49% | -1.33% | -44.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.67% | -16.43% | -3.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.48% | 4.16% | +22.32% |
Volatility
BITY vs. AIVC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) is 9.68%, while Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) has a volatility of 11.07%. This indicates that BITY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIVC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITY | AIVC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.68% | 11.07% | -1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.24% | 23.72% | +7.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.94% | 29.71% | +10.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.02% | 30.20% | +8.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.02% | 26.93% | +12.09% |
BITY vs. AIVC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than AIVC's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITY vs. AIVC - Dividend Comparison
BITY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.66%, more than AIVC's 0.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIVC Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF | 0.10% | 0.17% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.39% | 1.16% | 0.38% | 0.92% | 0.64% |
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF | 39.66% | 21.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BITY and AIVC have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIVC has higher volatility (11.07%) compared to BITY (9.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITY dropped -46.36% vs AIVC's -56.11%.
On 1-year performance, AIVC leads with 151.70% vs -37.35% for BITY. On fees, AIVC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, BITY has been the lower-risk option at 9.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AIVC has performed better with a 151.70% return vs -37.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AIVC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BITY.
BITY has the higher dividend yield at 39.66%, compared with 0.10% for AIVC.
BITY is categorized as Derivative Income, while AIVC is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BITY and 0.59% for AIVC.
AIVC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.14 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BITY and AIVC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer