BITY vs. ACYS

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

BITY (Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF) and ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BITY charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACYS.

Performance

BITY vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BITY

• 1D: -3.03%
• 1M: -3.75%
• 6M: -31.18%
• YTD: -27.84%
• 1Y: -46.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACYS

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 0.70%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITY vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF	-23.78%
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF	2.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BITY and ACYS is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026	0.28

Return for Risk

BITY vs. ACYS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITY

BITY Risk / Return Rank: 1
BITY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BITY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BITY Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BITY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BITY Martin Ratio Rank: 1

ACYS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITY vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BITY	ACYS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.13	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.73	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.92	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.52	—	—

Drawdowns

BITY vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITY drawdown since its inception was -50.87%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITY and ACYS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITY	ACYS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.87%	-0.63%	-50.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.85%	-0.24%	-48.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.05%	-0.14%	-21.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.65%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BITY	ACYS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.12%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.34%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.37%	3.45%	+37.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.36%	3.45%	+35.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.36%	3.45%	+35.91%

BITY vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BITY vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison

BITY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 40.57%, more than ACYS's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF	0.60%	0.00%
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF	40.57%	21.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BITY and ACYS in my portfolio?

BITY and ACYS have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BITY or ACYS?

On fees, BITY is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BITY or ACYS?

BITY is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACYS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BITY or ACYS?

BITY has the higher dividend yield at 40.57%, compared with 0.60% for ACYS.

What is the main difference between BITY and ACYS?

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BITY and 0.75% for ACYS.