PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITX vs. CTA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITX vs. CTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITX) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITX achieves a -59.63% return, which is significantly lower than CTA's 9.07% return.


BITX

1D
-10.38%
1M
-44.71%
YTD
-59.63%
6M
-62.06%
1Y
-76.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CTA

1D
-1.49%
1M
-5.00%
YTD
9.07%
6M
12.10%
1Y
9.47%
3Y*
10.84%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITX vs. CTA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BITX
2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF
-59.63%-38.71%163.41%47.23%
CTA
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
9.07%0.88%24.15%0.03%

Correlation

The correlation between BITX and CTA is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITX vs. CTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITX
BITX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

CTA
CTA Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
CTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTA Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
CTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTA Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITX vs. CTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITX) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITXCTADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.11

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

1.01

-1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.49

2.58

-4.07

BITX vs. CTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITX Sharpe Ratio is -0.86, which is lower than the CTA Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITX and CTA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BITXCTADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.86

0.55

-1.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.57

-0.58

Drawdowns

BITX vs. CTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITX drawdown since its inception was -82.16%, which is greater than CTA's maximum drawdown of -18.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITX and CTA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITXCTADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.16%

-18.07%

-64.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-82.16%

-11.00%

-71.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-82.16%

-10.51%

-71.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.83%

-5.68%

-26.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

50.55%

4.28%

+46.27%

Volatility

BITX vs. CTA - Volatility Comparison

2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITX) has a higher volatility of 20.21% compared to Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) at 6.69%. This indicates that BITX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITXCTADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.21%

6.69%

+13.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.69%

17.42%

+51.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

87.44%

20.23%

+67.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

98.39%

16.60%

+81.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

98.39%

16.60%

+81.79%

BITX vs. CTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITX has a 2.38% expense ratio, which is higher than CTA's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

BITX vs. CTA - Dividend Comparison

BITX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.27%, more than CTA's 4.99% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BITX
2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF
39.27%21.69%10.70%0.00%0.00%
CTA
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
4.99%3.19%4.80%7.78%6.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


BITX and CTA have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITX has higher volatility (20.21%) compared to CTA (6.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITX dropped -82.16% vs CTA's -18.07%.

On 1-year performance, CTA leads with 9.47% vs -76.33% for BITX. On fees, CTA is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, CTA has been the lower-risk option at 6.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CTA has performed better with a 9.47% return vs -76.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CTA is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 2.38% for BITX.

BITX has the higher dividend yield at 39.27%, compared with 4.99% for CTA.

BITX is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CTA is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 2.38% for BITX and 0.78% for CTA.

CTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITX and CTA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer