BITX vs. BFOC
BITX (2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF) and BFOC (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - BITX is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the S&P CME Bitcoin Futures Daily Roll Index (200%), while BFOC is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust. BITX is passively managed, while BFOC is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BITX charges 2.38%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFOC.
Performance
BITX vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITX achieves a -54.95% return, which is significantly lower than BFOC's -7.39% return.
BITX
- 1D
- -5.55%
- 1M
- -40.63%
- YTD
- -54.95%
- 6M
- -60.56%
- 1Y
- -74.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BFOC
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- YTD
- -7.39%
- 6M
- -9.28%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITX vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BITX 2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF | -54.95% | -49.57% |
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | -7.39% | -9.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITX and BFOC is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITX vs. BFOC — Risk / Return Rank
BITX
BFOC
BITX vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITX) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BITX | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BITX | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | -1.88 | +1.90 |
Drawdowns
BITX vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITX drawdown since its inception was -80.09%, which is greater than BFOC's maximum drawdown of -18.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITX and BFOC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITX | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.09% | -18.20% | -61.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -80.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.09% | -18.20% | -61.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.77% | -12.52% | -19.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.28% | — | — |
Volatility
BITX vs. BFOC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITX | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.52% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.11% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 86.90% | 12.61% | +74.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 98.26% | 12.61% | +85.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 98.26% | 12.61% | +85.65% |
BITX vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITX has a 2.38% expense ratio, which is higher than BFOC's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITX vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison
BITX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.20%, while BFOC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BITX 2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF | 35.20% | 21.69% | 10.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BITX and BFOC have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BFOC is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BFOC is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 2.38% for BITX.
BITX has the higher dividend yield at 35.20%, compared with 0.00% for BFOC.
BITX is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 2.38% for BITX and 0.90% for BFOC.
Find the right allocation for BITX and BFOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer