PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITW vs. LEGR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITW vs. LEGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF (BITW) and First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITW achieves a -30.09% return, which is significantly lower than LEGR's 11.39% return.


BITW

1D
1.83%
1M
-15.18%
YTD
-30.09%
6M
-31.04%
1Y
-33.61%
3Y*
53.76%
5Y*
3.43%
10Y*

LEGR

1D
0.48%
1M
1.45%
YTD
11.39%
6M
11.72%
1Y
29.51%
3Y*
23.21%
5Y*
12.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITW vs. LEGR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BITW
Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF
-30.09%-2.63%160.69%331.10%-85.92%-36.83%403.25%
LEGR
First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF
11.39%30.83%16.25%22.79%-19.01%17.91%15.09%

Correlation

The correlation between BITW and LEGR is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2020

0.36

The correlation between BITW and LEGR shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITW vs. LEGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITW
BITW Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BITW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITW Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITW Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BITW Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITW Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

LEGR
LEGR Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
LEGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEGR Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
LEGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEGR Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITW vs. LEGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF (BITW) and First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BITWLEGRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.36

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.61

2.85

-3.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.04

10.43

-11.47

BITW vs. LEGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITW Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the LEGR Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITW and LEGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BITW vs. LEGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITW drawdown since its inception was -96.46%, which is greater than LEGR's maximum drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITW and LEGR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITWLEGRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.46%

-36.12%

-60.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.51%

-10.40%

-45.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.51%

-14.25%

-41.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.93%

-31.45%

-60.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.45%

-2.37%

-68.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.56%

-6.59%

-62.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.38%

2.84%

+29.54%

Volatility

BITW vs. LEGR - Volatility Comparison

Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF (BITW) has a higher volatility of 13.95% compared to First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) at 5.63%. This indicates that BITW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LEGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITWLEGRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.95%

5.63%

+8.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.24%

12.16%

+25.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.88%

14.43%

+35.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.58%

17.07%

+48.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

108.37%

20.32%

+88.05%

BITW vs. LEGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITW has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than LEGR's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

BITW vs. LEGR - Dividend Comparison

BITW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LEGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BITW
Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LEGR
First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF
1.68%1.84%2.40%2.56%2.64%1.80%0.95%2.04%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


BITW and LEGR have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITW has higher volatility (13.95%) compared to LEGR (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITW dropped -96.46% vs LEGR's -36.12%.

On 5-year performance, LEGR leads with 12.04% vs 3.43% for BITW. On fees, LEGR is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, LEGR has been the lower-risk option at 5.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LEGR has performed better with a 12.04% return vs 3.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LEGR is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BITW.

LEGR has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.00% for BITW.

BITW is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while LEGR is Blockchain. BITW tracks Bitwise 10 Large Cap Crypto Index, while LEGR tracks Indxx Blockchain Index. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BITW and 0.65% for LEGR.

LEGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITW and LEGR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer