BITW vs. IMST
BITW (Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF) and IMST (Bitwise Funds Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - BITW is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bitwise 10 Large Cap Crypto Index, while IMST is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Bitwise. BITW is passively managed, while IMST is actively managed. Over the past year, BITW returned -33.61% vs -65.63% for IMST. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BITW charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for IMST.
Performance
BITW vs. IMST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITW achieves a -30.09% return, which is significantly lower than IMST's -23.72% return.
BITW
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- -15.18%
- YTD
- -30.09%
- 6M
- -31.04%
- 1Y
- -33.61%
- 3Y*
- 53.76%
- 5Y*
- 3.43%
- 10Y*
- —
IMST
- 1D
- -3.31%
- 1M
- -25.37%
- YTD
- -23.72%
- 6M
- -27.66%
- 1Y
- -65.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITW vs. IMST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BITW Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF | -30.09% | 14.65% |
IMST Bitwise Funds Trust | -23.72% | -46.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITW and IMST is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025 | 0.77 |
The correlation between BITW and IMST has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITW vs. IMST — Risk / Return Rank
BITW
IMST
BITW vs. IMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF (BITW) and Bitwise Funds Trust (IMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BITW | IMST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 0.77 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | -0.94 | +0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | -1.35 | +0.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BITW vs. IMST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITW drawdown since its inception was -96.46%, which is greater than IMST's maximum drawdown of -70.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITW and IMST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITW | IMST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.46% | -70.16% | -26.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.51% | -70.16% | +14.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.45% | -70.16% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.56% | -36.46% | -33.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.38% | 48.53% | -16.15% |
Volatility
BITW vs. IMST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF (BITW) is 13.95%, while Bitwise Funds Trust (IMST) has a volatility of 17.51%. This indicates that BITW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITW | IMST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.95% | 17.51% | -3.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.24% | 44.15% | -6.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.88% | 58.14% | -8.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.58% | 59.70% | +5.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 108.37% | 59.70% | +48.67% |
BITW vs. IMST - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITW has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than IMST's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITW vs. IMST - Dividend Comparison
BITW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IMST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 247.21%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BITW Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IMST Bitwise Funds Trust | 247.21% | 195.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BITW and IMST have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMST has higher volatility (17.51%) compared to BITW (13.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITW dropped -96.46% vs IMST's -70.16%.
On 1-year performance, BITW leads with -33.61% vs -65.63% for IMST. On fees, BITW is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BITW has been the lower-risk option at 13.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BITW has performed better with a -33.61% return vs -65.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BITW is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IMST.
IMST has the higher dividend yield at 247.21%, compared with 0.00% for BITW.
BITW is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while IMST is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BITW and 0.99% for IMST.
BITW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.68 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BITW and IMST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer