PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITW vs. IMST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITW vs. IMST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF (BITW) and Bitwise Funds Trust (IMST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITW achieves a -30.09% return, which is significantly lower than IMST's -23.72% return.


BITW

1D
1.83%
1M
-15.18%
YTD
-30.09%
6M
-31.04%
1Y
-33.61%
3Y*
53.76%
5Y*
3.43%
10Y*

IMST

1D
-3.31%
1M
-25.37%
YTD
-23.72%
6M
-27.66%
1Y
-65.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITW vs. IMST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BITW
Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF
-30.09%14.65%
IMST
Bitwise Funds Trust
-23.72%-46.36%

Correlation

The correlation between BITW and IMST is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025

0.77

The correlation between BITW and IMST has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITW vs. IMST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITW
BITW Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BITW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITW Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITW Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BITW Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITW Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

IMST
IMST Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
IMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMST Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
IMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMST Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITW vs. IMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF (BITW) and Bitwise Funds Trust (IMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BITWIMSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

0.77

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.61

-0.94

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.04

-1.35

+0.31

BITW vs. IMST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITW Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is higher than the IMST Sharpe Ratio of -1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITW and IMST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BITW vs. IMST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITW drawdown since its inception was -96.46%, which is greater than IMST's maximum drawdown of -70.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITW and IMST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITWIMSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.46%

-70.16%

-26.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.51%

-70.16%

+14.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.45%

-70.16%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.56%

-36.46%

-33.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.38%

48.53%

-16.15%

Volatility

BITW vs. IMST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF (BITW) is 13.95%, while Bitwise Funds Trust (IMST) has a volatility of 17.51%. This indicates that BITW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITWIMSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.95%

17.51%

-3.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.24%

44.15%

-6.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.88%

58.14%

-8.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.58%

59.70%

+5.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

108.37%

59.70%

+48.67%

BITW vs. IMST - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITW has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than IMST's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

BITW vs. IMST - Dividend Comparison

BITW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IMST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 247.21%.


PositionTTM2025
BITW
Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF
0.00%0.00%
IMST
Bitwise Funds Trust
247.21%195.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


BITW and IMST have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMST has higher volatility (17.51%) compared to BITW (13.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITW dropped -96.46% vs IMST's -70.16%.

On 1-year performance, BITW leads with -33.61% vs -65.63% for IMST. On fees, BITW is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BITW has been the lower-risk option at 13.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BITW has performed better with a -33.61% return vs -65.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BITW is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IMST.

IMST has the higher dividend yield at 247.21%, compared with 0.00% for BITW.

BITW is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while IMST is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BITW and 0.99% for IMST.

BITW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.68 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITW and IMST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer