BITW vs. EZET
BITW (Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF) and EZET (Franklin Ethereum ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - BITW tracks the Bitwise 10 Large Cap Crypto Index while EZET tracks the CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BITW returned -43.69% vs -40.67% for EZET. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BITW charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZET.
Performance
BITW vs. EZET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITW achieves a -30.14% return, which is significantly higher than EZET's -39.70% return.
BITW
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- 6M
- -32.94%
- YTD
- -30.14%
- 1Y
- -43.69%
- 3Y*
- 51.89%
- 5Y*
- 0.52%
- 10Y*
- —
EZET
- 1D
- 2.49%
- 1M
- 7.69%
- 6M
- -41.69%
- YTD
- -39.70%
- 1Y
- -40.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITW vs. EZET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BITW Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF | -30.14% | -2.63% | 59.19% |
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF | -39.70% | -11.23% | -4.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITW and EZET is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024 | 0.83 |
The correlation between BITW and EZET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITW vs. EZET — Risk / Return Rank
BITW
EZET
BITW vs. EZET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF (BITW) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BITW | EZET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 0.95 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | -0.54 | -0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | -0.86 | -0.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BITW vs. EZET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITW drawdown since its inception was -96.46%, which is greater than EZET's maximum drawdown of -67.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITW and EZET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITW | EZET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.46% | -67.89% | -28.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.45% | -67.89% | +11.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.47% | -63.04% | -7.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.58% | -34.41% | -35.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.66% | 42.85% | -8.19% |
Volatility
BITW vs. EZET - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF (BITW) is 12.11%, while Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) has a volatility of 16.08%. This indicates that BITW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITW | EZET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.11% | 16.08% | -3.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.29% | 46.99% | -9.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.73% | 68.50% | -18.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.29% | 72.03% | -6.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 107.95% | 72.03% | +35.92% |
BITW vs. EZET - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITW has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EZET's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITW vs. EZET - Dividend Comparison
Neither BITW nor EZET has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, BITW and EZET move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EZET has higher volatility (16.08%) compared to BITW (12.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITW dropped -96.46% vs EZET's -67.89%.
On 1-year performance, EZET leads with -40.67% vs -43.69% for BITW. On fees, EZET is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BITW has been the lower-risk option at 12.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EZET has performed better with a -40.67% return vs -43.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EZET is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BITW.
BITW and EZET have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BITW tracks Bitwise 10 Large Cap Crypto Index, while EZET tracks CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BITW and 0.19% for EZET.
EZET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.54 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BITW and EZET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer