PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITU vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITU vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITU achieves a -51.92% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 14.05% return.


BITU

1D
9.21%
1M
-31.11%
YTD
-51.92%
6M
-50.40%
1Y
-71.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDA

1D
3.54%
1M
-5.60%
YTD
14.05%
6M
20.66%
1Y
49.84%
3Y*
70.84%
5Y*
64.29%
10Y*
68.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITU vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
-51.92%-37.07%41.85%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
14.05%38.92%48.65%

Correlation

The correlation between BITU and NVDA is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITU vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITU
BITU Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITU Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITU Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITU Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITU vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BITUNVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.24

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.87

2.48

-3.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.38

5.89

-7.27

BITU vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITU Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITU and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BITU vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITU drawdown since its inception was -82.21%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITU and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITUNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.21%

-89.72%

+7.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-82.21%

-20.21%

-62.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.50%

-9.77%

-68.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.10%

-36.17%

+1.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

51.85%

8.48%

+43.37%

Volatility

BITU vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a higher volatility of 25.78% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 12.97%. This indicates that BITU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITUNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.78%

12.97%

+12.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.18%

26.83%

+43.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

88.32%

35.13%

+53.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

97.56%

51.80%

+45.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

97.56%

49.87%

+47.69%

Dividends

BITU vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

BITU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 81.62%, more than NVDA's 0.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
81.62%50.23%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.13%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


BITU and NVDA have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITU has higher volatility (25.78%) compared to NVDA (12.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITU dropped -82.21% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITU and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer