PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITU vs. IQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITU vs. IQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITU achieves a -52.92% return, which is significantly lower than IQQQ's 18.72% return.


BITU

1D
-5.58%
1M
-34.84%
YTD
-52.92%
6M
-59.11%
1Y
-73.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IQQQ

1D
-0.30%
1M
9.88%
YTD
18.72%
6M
17.39%
1Y
38.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITU vs. IQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
-52.92%-37.07%37.90%
IQQQ
ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
18.72%17.11%13.74%

Correlation

The correlation between BITU and IQQQ is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024

0.44

BITU vs. IQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BITU
IQQQ

Financial Services

4.2%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Industrials

-

2.8%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

53.8%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Financial Services

BITU
4.2%
IQQQ
0.2%

Basic Materials

BITU

-

IQQQ
1.1%

Communication Services

BITU

-

IQQQ
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

BITU

-

IQQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

BITU

-

IQQQ
7.7%

Energy

BITU

-

IQQQ
0.6%

Healthcare

BITU

-

IQQQ
4.2%

Industrials

BITU

-

IQQQ
2.8%

Real Estate

BITU

-

IQQQ
0.1%

Technology

BITU

-

IQQQ
53.8%

Utilities

BITU

-

IQQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITU vs. IQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITU
BITU Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITU Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITU Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITU Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

IQQQ
IQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITU vs. IQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITUIQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.43

-0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.93

3.49

-4.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.47

12.41

-13.87

BITU vs. IQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITU Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is lower than the IQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITU and IQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BITUIQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.84

2.53

-3.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.35

1.25

-1.59

Drawdowns

BITU vs. IQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITU drawdown since its inception was -78.94%, which is greater than IQQQ's maximum drawdown of -20.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITU and IQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITUIQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.94%

-20.41%

-58.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-78.94%

-11.13%

-67.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.94%

-0.30%

-78.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.49%

-3.64%

-30.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

49.84%

3.13%

+46.71%

Volatility

BITU vs. IQQQ - Volatility Comparison

Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a higher volatility of 18.99% compared to ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ) at 3.99%. This indicates that BITU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITUIQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.99%

3.99%

+15.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

69.41%

11.54%

+57.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

87.00%

15.40%

+71.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

97.45%

18.57%

+78.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

97.45%

18.57%

+78.88%

BITU vs. IQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IQQQ's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

BITU vs. IQQQ - Dividend Comparison

BITU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 83.36%, more than IQQQ's 4.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
83.36%50.23%0.12%
IQQQ
ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
4.42%10.34%7.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


BITU and IQQQ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITU has higher volatility (18.99%) compared to IQQQ (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITU dropped -78.94% vs IQQQ's -20.41%.

On 1-year performance, IQQQ leads with 38.70% vs -73.07% for BITU. On fees, IQQQ is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, IQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IQQQ has performed better with a 38.70% return vs -73.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IQQQ is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BITU.

BITU has the higher dividend yield at 83.36%, compared with 4.42% for IQQQ.

BITU is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while IQQQ is Nasdaq-100. BITU tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while IQQQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Daily Covered Call Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BITU and 0.55% for IQQQ.

IQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITU and IQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer