PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITS vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITS vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITS achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 9.63% return.


BITS

1D
-2.95%
1M
-9.90%
YTD
-1.05%
6M
-4.96%
1Y
16.16%
3Y*
41.04%
5Y*
10Y*

YCS

1D
-0.14%
1M
3.57%
YTD
9.63%
6M
10.44%
1Y
31.27%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
23.52%
10Y*
13.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITS vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BITS
Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF
-1.05%14.90%61.84%212.23%-75.46%-28.96%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
9.63%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%1.40%

Correlation

The correlation between BITS and YCS is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITS vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITS
BITS Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
BITS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITS Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
BITS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITS Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITS vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BITSYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.34

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

3.78

-3.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.60

11.93

-11.33

BITS vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITS Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITS and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BITS vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITS drawdown since its inception was -83.11%, which is greater than YCS's maximum drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITS and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITSYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.11%

-49.56%

-33.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.38%

-8.30%

-40.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.38%

-23.05%

-25.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.86%

-0.14%

-34.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.63%

-19.87%

-22.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.82%

2.65%

+24.17%

Volatility

BITS vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) has a higher volatility of 14.66% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.25%. This indicates that BITS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITSYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.66%

2.25%

+12.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.96%

12.19%

+28.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.22%

16.93%

+36.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.86%

21.10%

+39.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.86%

18.82%

+42.04%

BITS vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

BITS vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

BITS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.04%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BITS
Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF
23.04%22.80%29.49%13.69%0.48%1.90%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BITS and YCS have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITS has higher volatility (14.66%) compared to YCS (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITS dropped -83.11% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 3-year performance, BITS leads with 41.04% vs 18.37% for YCS. On fees, BITS is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BITS has performed better with a 41.04% return vs 18.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BITS is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

BITS has the higher dividend yield at 23.04%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

BITS is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. BITS tracks NONE, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BITS and 1.00% for YCS.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITS and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer