PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITS vs. SIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BITS vs. SIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BITS vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BITS
Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF
-17.84%14.90%61.84%212.23%-75.46%-29.31%
SIL
Global X Silver Miners ETF
7.85%166.16%14.62%1.31%-22.83%-9.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITS achieves a -17.84% return, which is significantly lower than SIL's 7.85% return.


BITS

1D
4.79%
1M
-4.40%
YTD
-17.84%
6M
-35.16%
1Y
24.71%
3Y*
40.54%
5Y*
10Y*

SIL

1D
7.82%
1M
-23.68%
YTD
7.85%
6M
27.11%
1Y
131.18%
3Y*
45.13%
5Y*
18.33%
10Y*
14.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BITS vs. SIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BITS and SIL have an expense ratio of 0.65%.


Return for Risk

BITS vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITS
BITS Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
BITS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITS Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
BITS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITS Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

SIL
SIL Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITS vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITSSILDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.46

2.65

-2.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.99

2.73

-1.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.40

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

3.98

-3.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.97

13.73

-12.77

BITS vs. SIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITS Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the SIL Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITS and SIL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BITSSILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

2.65

-2.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.07

0.14

-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between BITS and SIL is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BITS vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison

BITS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.75%, more than SIL's 1.10% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BITS
Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF
27.75%22.80%29.49%13.69%0.48%1.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SIL
Global X Silver Miners ETF
1.10%1.18%2.40%0.59%0.48%1.59%1.92%1.53%1.21%0.02%3.34%0.38%

Drawdowns

BITS vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITS drawdown since its inception was -83.11%, roughly equal to the maximum SIL drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITS and SIL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BITSSILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.11%

-82.99%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.38%

-32.91%

-15.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.91%

-23.68%

-22.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.20%

-51.79%

+8.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.91%

9.53%

+12.38%

Volatility

BITS vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) is 17.70%, while Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a volatility of 19.45%. This indicates that BITS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BITSSILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.70%

19.45%

-1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.68%

42.52%

+1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.59%

49.72%

+4.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.52%

38.63%

+22.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.52%

39.74%

+21.78%