BITS vs. GLNK

Last updated Jun 21, 2026

BITS (Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF) and GLNK (Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - BITS tracks the NONE while GLNK tracks the Chainlink (LINK). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BITS returned 48.96%/yr vs -10.78%/yr for GLNK. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BITS charges 0.65%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for GLNK.

Performance

BITS vs. GLNK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITS achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly higher than GLNK's -35.47% return.

BITS

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: -7.50%
• YTD: 1.58%
• 6M: -2.79%
• 1Y: 17.77%
• 3Y*: 48.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GLNK

• 1D: -1.43%
• 1M: -16.21%
• YTD: -35.47%
• 6M: -37.23%
• 1Y: -59.76%
• 3Y*: -10.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITS vs. GLNK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BITS Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF	1.58%	14.90%	61.84%	212.23%	-50.07%
GLNK Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF	-35.47%	-87.10%	38.45%	840.06%	-18.87%

Correlation

The correlation between BITS and GLNK is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022	0.32

Over the past year, BITS and GLNK have become more correlated (0.59) than their long-term average of 0.32, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

BITS vs. GLNK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITS

BITS Risk / Return Rank: 13
BITS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
BITS Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
BITS Omega Ratio Rank: 15
BITS Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
BITS Martin Ratio Rank: 11

GLNK

GLNK Risk / Return Rank: 5
GLNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
GLNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
GLNK Omega Ratio Rank: 5
GLNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
GLNK Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITS vs. GLNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BITS	GLNK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.31	-0.55	+0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.79	-0.44	+1.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	0.95	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.34	-0.66	+1.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.62	-0.86	+1.48

BITS vs. GLNK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITS Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is higher than the GLNK Sharpe Ratio of -0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITS and GLNK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BITS vs. GLNK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITS drawdown since its inception was -83.11%, smaller than the maximum GLNK drawdown of -96.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITS and GLNK.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITS	GLNK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.11%	-96.17%	+13.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.38%	-89.27%	+40.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.38%	-96.17%	+47.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.12%	-95.85%	+62.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.64%	-56.09%	+13.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.65%	69.13%	-42.48%

Volatility

BITS vs. GLNK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) is 15.01%, while Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK) has a volatility of 19.35%. This indicates that BITS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLNK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BITS	GLNK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.01%	19.35%	-4.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.00%	47.74%	-6.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.15%	107.87%	-54.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.90%	164.11%	-103.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.90%	164.11%	-103.21%

BITS vs. GLNK - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than GLNK's 2.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BITS vs. GLNK - Dividend Comparison

BITS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.44%, while GLNK has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BITS Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF	22.44%	22.80%	29.49%	13.69%	0.48%	1.90%
GLNK Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BITS and GLNK in my portfolio?

BITS and GLNK have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BITS or GLNK?

GLNK has higher volatility (19.35%) compared to BITS (15.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITS dropped -83.11% vs GLNK's -96.17%.

Which ETF is better, BITS or GLNK?

On 3-year performance, BITS leads with 48.96% vs -10.78% for GLNK. On fees, BITS is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, BITS has been the lower-risk option at 15.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BITS or GLNK?

Over the 3-year period, BITS has performed better with a 48.96% return vs -10.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BITS or GLNK?

BITS is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for GLNK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BITS or GLNK?

BITS has the higher dividend yield at 22.44%, compared with 0.00% for GLNK.

What is the main difference between BITS and GLNK?

BITS tracks NONE, while GLNK tracks Chainlink (LINK). They also come from different issuers: Global X and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BITS and 2.50% for GLNK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BITS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.31 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.