BITQ vs. IDGT

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BITQ (Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF) and IDGT (iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - BITQ tracks the Bitwise Crypto Innovators 30 Total Return while IDGT tracks the S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BITQ returned 4.91%/yr vs 13.41%/yr for IDGT. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BITQ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for IDGT.

Performance

BITQ vs. IDGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITQ achieves a 37.93% return, which is significantly lower than IDGT's 54.64% return.

BITQ

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: 4.84%
• YTD: 37.93%
• 6M: 16.04%
• 1Y: 53.75%
• 3Y*: 60.76%
• 5Y*: 4.91%
• 10Y*: —

IDGT

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 7.28%
• YTD: 54.64%
• 6M: 51.00%
• 1Y: 62.97%
• 3Y*: 26.10%
• 5Y*: 13.41%
• 10Y*: 14.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITQ vs. IDGT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF	37.93%	18.00%	46.97%	246.83%	-83.86%	-7.06%
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF	54.64%	6.79%	26.71%	-6.09%	-17.90%	30.25%

Correlation

The correlation between BITQ and IDGT is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2021	0.54

The correlation between BITQ and IDGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

BITQ vs. IDGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BITQ	IDGT
Financial Services	67.1%	-
Technology	28.1%	60.7%
Consumer Cyclical	4.8%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	4.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	34.3%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BITQ vs. IDGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITQ

BITQ Risk / Return Rank: 27
BITQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
BITQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
BITQ Omega Ratio Rank: 28
BITQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
BITQ Martin Ratio Rank: 22

IDGT

IDGT Risk / Return Rank: 90
IDGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
IDGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
IDGT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
IDGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
IDGT Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITQ vs. IDGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BITQ	IDGT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	3.11	-2.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	3.94	-2.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.52	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.20	7.49	-6.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.53	22.44	-19.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BITQ vs. IDGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the IDGT Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITQ and IDGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BITQ	IDGT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97	3.11	-2.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07	0.58	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.62	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	0.18	-0.12

Drawdowns

BITQ vs. IDGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITQ drawdown since its inception was -90.32%, which is greater than IDGT's maximum drawdown of -77.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITQ and IDGT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITQ	IDGT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.32%	-77.95%	-12.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.99%	-8.45%	-36.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-51.22%	-23.74%	-27.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-90.32%	-35.83%	-54.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.88%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.21%	-1.10%	-14.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.77%	-19.91%	-32.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.33%	2.82%	+18.51%

Volatility

BITQ vs. IDGT - Volatility Comparison

Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) has a higher volatility of 14.24% compared to iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) at 7.78%. This indicates that BITQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BITQ	IDGT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.24%	7.78%	+6.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.58%	16.35%	+26.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	55.93%	20.37%	+35.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.18%	23.19%	+43.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	67.21%	23.29%	+43.92%

BITQ vs. IDGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITQ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IDGT's 0.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

BITQ vs. IDGT - Dividend Comparison

BITQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.90%	1.51%	0.00%	3.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF	0.72%	1.17%	1.64%	0.37%	0.30%	0.28%	0.60%	0.42%	0.65%	0.57%	0.75%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BITQ and IDGT in my portfolio?

BITQ and IDGT have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BITQ or IDGT?

BITQ has higher volatility (14.24%) compared to IDGT (7.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITQ dropped -90.32% vs IDGT's -77.95%.

Which ETF is better, BITQ or IDGT?

On 5-year performance, IDGT leads with 13.41% vs 4.91% for BITQ. On fees, IDGT is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, IDGT has been the lower-risk option at 7.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BITQ or IDGT?

Over the 5-year period, IDGT has performed better with a 13.41% return vs 4.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BITQ or IDGT?

IDGT is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BITQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BITQ or IDGT?

IDGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.00% for BITQ.

What is the main difference between BITQ and IDGT?

BITQ tracks Bitwise Crypto Innovators 30 Total Return, while IDGT tracks S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for BITQ and 0.41% for IDGT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IDGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.