BITQ vs. HECO
BITQ (Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF) and HECO (State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF) are both Blockchain funds. BITQ is passively managed, while HECO is actively managed. Over the past year, BITQ returned 49.39% vs 136.37% for HECO. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BITQ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for HECO.
Performance
BITQ vs. HECO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITQ achieves a 34.62% return, which is significantly lower than HECO's 72.76% return.
BITQ
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 34.62%
- 6M
- 25.61%
- 1Y
- 49.39%
- 3Y*
- 53.03%
- 5Y*
- 4.41%
- 10Y*
- —
HECO
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 12.83%
- YTD
- 72.76%
- 6M
- 65.53%
- 1Y
- 136.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITQ vs. HECO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF | 34.62% | 18.00% | 46.59% |
HECO State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF | 72.76% | 26.23% | 28.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITQ and HECO is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024 | 0.92 |
The correlation between BITQ and HECO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
BITQ vs. HECO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BITQ
HECO
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
BITQ
HECO
Technology
BITQ
HECO
Consumer Cyclical
BITQ
HECO
-
Basic Materials
BITQ
-
HECO
Communication Services
BITQ
-
HECO
-
Consumer Defensive
BITQ
-
HECO
-
Energy
BITQ
-
HECO
-
Healthcare
BITQ
-
HECO
-
Industrials
BITQ
-
HECO
Real Estate
BITQ
-
HECO
-
Utilities
BITQ
-
HECO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITQ vs. HECO — Risk / Return Rank
BITQ
HECO
BITQ vs. HECO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (HECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BITQ | HECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.51 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 6.52 | -5.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.30 | 18.64 | -16.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BITQ vs. HECO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITQ drawdown since its inception was -90.32%, which is greater than HECO's maximum drawdown of -44.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITQ and HECO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITQ | HECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.32% | -44.59% | -45.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.99% | -21.03% | -23.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.24% | -1.40% | -15.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.52% | -11.53% | -40.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.50% | 7.35% | +14.15% |
Volatility
BITQ vs. HECO - Volatility Comparison
Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) has a higher volatility of 16.45% compared to State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (HECO) at 10.26%. This indicates that BITQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HECO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITQ | HECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.45% | 10.26% | +6.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.05% | 28.99% | +14.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.94% | 37.49% | +19.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.32% | 44.68% | +22.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.24% | 44.68% | +22.56% |
BITQ vs. HECO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITQ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than HECO's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITQ vs. HECO - Dividend Comparison
Neither BITQ nor HECO has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.90% | 1.51% | 0.00% | 3.12% |
HECO State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, BITQ and HECO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BITQ has higher volatility (16.45%) compared to HECO (10.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITQ dropped -90.32% vs HECO's -44.59%.
On 1-year performance, HECO leads with 136.37% vs 49.39% for BITQ. On fees, BITQ is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, HECO has been the lower-risk option at 10.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HECO has performed better with a 136.37% return vs 49.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BITQ is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for HECO.
BITQ and HECO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for BITQ and 0.90% for HECO.
HECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.66 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BITQ and HECO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer