BITO vs. YMAG
BITO (ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF) and YMAG (YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs) are both exchange-traded funds - BITO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares, while YMAG is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BITO returned -41.98% vs 20.61% for YMAG. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BITO charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for YMAG.
Performance
BITO vs. YMAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITO achieves a -28.44% return, which is significantly lower than YMAG's -1.13% return.
BITO
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -22.17%
- YTD
- -28.44%
- 6M
- -30.74%
- 1Y
- -41.98%
- 3Y*
- 26.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YMAG
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -7.03%
- YTD
- -1.13%
- 6M
- -0.01%
- 1Y
- 20.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITO vs. YMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | -28.44% | -11.19% | 101.02% |
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs | -1.13% | 18.64% | 34.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITO and YMAG is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITO vs. YMAG — Risk / Return Rank
BITO
YMAG
BITO vs. YMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) and YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BITO | YMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.21 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | 1.37 | -2.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.42 | 4.68 | -6.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BITO vs. YMAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITO drawdown since its inception was -77.86%, which is greater than YMAG's maximum drawdown of -25.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITO and YMAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITO | YMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.86% | -25.96% | -51.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.10% | -14.38% | -38.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.64% | -7.32% | -43.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.79% | -4.54% | -32.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.32% | 4.21% | +26.11% |
Volatility
BITO vs. YMAG - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) has a higher volatility of 11.73% compared to YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) at 5.03%. This indicates that BITO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YMAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITO | YMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.73% | 5.03% | +6.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.20% | 12.27% | +21.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.88% | 16.41% | +27.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.07% | 20.94% | +34.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.07% | 20.94% | +34.13% |
BITO vs. YMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than YMAG's 1.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITO vs. YMAG - Dividend Comparison
BITO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 69.59%, more than YMAG's 52.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | 69.59% | 78.29% | 61.59% | 15.14% |
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs | 52.85% | 52.27% | 35.22% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BITO and YMAG have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITO has higher volatility (11.73%) compared to YMAG (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITO dropped -77.86% vs YMAG's -25.96%.
On 1-year performance, YMAG leads with 20.61% vs -41.98% for BITO. On fees, BITO is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, YMAG has been the lower-risk option at 5.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, YMAG has performed better with a 20.61% return vs -41.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BITO is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAG.
BITO has the higher dividend yield at 69.59%, compared with 52.85% for YMAG.
BITO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while YMAG is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BITO and 1.28% for YMAG.
YMAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BITO and YMAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer