PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITO vs. ARKB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITO vs. ARKB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) and ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BITO having a -28.44% return and ARKB slightly higher at -27.41%.


BITO

1D
-2.81%
1M
-22.52%
YTD
-28.44%
6M
-32.46%
1Y
-41.98%
3Y*
26.82%
5Y*
10Y*

ARKB

1D
-2.77%
1M
-22.21%
YTD
-27.41%
6M
-31.40%
1Y
-39.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITO vs. ARKB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
-28.44%-11.19%87.60%
ARKB
ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
-27.41%-6.59%99.47%

Correlation

The correlation between BITO and ARKB is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

1.00

The correlation between BITO and ARKB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITO vs. ARKB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITO
BITO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

ARKB
ARKB Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
ARKB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKB Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKB Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKB Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKB Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITO vs. ARKB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) and ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITOARKBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

0.86

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

-0.80

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.44

-1.39

-0.05

BITO vs. ARKB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITO Sharpe Ratio is -0.97, which is comparable to the ARKB Sharpe Ratio of -0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITO and ARKB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BITOARKBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.97

-0.91

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

0.27

-0.37

Drawdowns

BITO vs. ARKB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITO drawdown since its inception was -77.86%, which is greater than ARKB's maximum drawdown of -49.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITO and ARKB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITOARKBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.86%

-49.45%

-28.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.64%

-49.45%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.64%

-49.45%

-1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.75%

-16.04%

-20.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.27%

28.57%

+0.70%

Volatility

BITO vs. ARKB - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) and ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) have volatilities of 9.03% and 9.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITOARKBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.03%

9.08%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.71%

33.76%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.61%

43.58%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.10%

49.93%

+5.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.10%

49.93%

+5.17%

BITO vs. ARKB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ARKB's 0.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

BITO vs. ARKB - Dividend Comparison

BITO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 69.59%, while ARKB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
ARKB
ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
69.59%78.29%61.59%15.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, BITO and ARKB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ARKB has higher volatility (9.08%) compared to BITO (9.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITO dropped -77.86% vs ARKB's -49.45%.

On 1-year performance, ARKB leads with -39.62% vs -41.98% for BITO. On fees, ARKB is cheaper at 0.21% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ARKB has performed better with a -39.62% return vs -41.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ARKB is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BITO.

BITO has the higher dividend yield at 69.59%, compared with 0.00% for ARKB.

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BITO and 0.21% for ARKB.

ARKB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.91 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITO and ARKB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer