PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITF.TO vs. MARA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BITF.TO vs. MARA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Bitfarms Ltd (BITF.TO) and MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BITF.TO is traded in CAD, while MARA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MARA values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITF.TO achieves a 155.11% return, which is significantly higher than MARA's 56.69% return.


BITF.TO

1D
-4.19%
1M
70.60%
YTD
155.11%
6M
89.86%
1Y
538.76%
3Y*
76.45%
5Y*
8.86%
10Y*

MARA

1D
-0.47%
1M
16.59%
YTD
56.69%
6M
11.19%
1Y
-9.92%
3Y*
16.04%
5Y*
-8.06%
10Y*
-10.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITF.TO vs. MARA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BITF.TO
Bitfarms Ltd
155.11%51.64%-44.68%587.50%-91.22%155.20%400.00%-75.00%
MARA
MARA Holdings, Inc.
56.69%-48.91%-22.47%571.71%-88.85%211.91%1,064.46%-60.81%

Correlation

The correlation between BITF.TO and MARA is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.63

The correlation between BITF.TO and MARA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BITF.TO:

CA$4.97B

MARA:

$5.28B

EPS

BITF.TO:

-CA$0.56

MARA:

-$4.95

PS Ratio

BITF.TO:

23.48

MARA:

6.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

BITF.TO:

CA$199.32M

MARA:

$867.82M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BITF.TO:

-CA$44.60M

MARA:

$164.95M

EBITDA (TTM)

BITF.TO:

-CA$99.48M

MARA:

$373.68M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITF.TO vs. MARA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITF.TO
BITF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
BITF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
BITF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

MARA
MARA Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MARA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MARA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
MARA Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
MARA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MARA Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITF.TO vs. MARA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitfarms Ltd (BITF.TO) and MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITF.TOMARADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.04

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.31

-0.14

+7.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.11

-0.23

+12.34

BITF.TO vs. MARA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.83, which is higher than the MARA Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITF.TO and MARA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BITF.TOMARADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.83

-0.13

+4.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

-0.08

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

-0.08

+0.27

Drawdowns

BITF.TO vs. MARA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITF.TO drawdown since its inception was -95.19%, roughly equal to the maximum MARA drawdown of -99.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITF.TO and MARA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITF.TOMARADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.19%

-99.68%

+4.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-74.40%

-71.22%

-3.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-79.84%

-78.10%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.19%

-95.51%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.29%

-89.26%

+63.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.62%

-76.38%

+6.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

44.80%

42.69%

+2.11%

Volatility

BITF.TO vs. MARA - Volatility Comparison

Bitfarms Ltd (BITF.TO) has a higher volatility of 26.82% compared to MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA) at 16.27%. This indicates that BITF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MARA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITF.TOMARADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.82%

16.27%

+10.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.65%

57.72%

+10.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

112.59%

76.70%

+35.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

103.48%

104.16%

-0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

120.87%

143.01%

-22.14%

Dividends

BITF.TO vs. MARA - Dividend Comparison

Neither BITF.TO nor MARA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

BITF.TO vs. MARA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bitfarms Ltd and MARA Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20222023202420252026
36.90M
174.61M
(BITF.TO) Total Revenue
(MARA) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BITF.TO values in CAD, MARA values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


BITF.TO and MARA have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITF.TO and MARA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer