BITF.TO vs. MARA
Compare and contrast key facts about Bitfarms Ltd (BITF.TO) and Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA).
Performance
BITF.TO vs. MARA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BITF.TO vs. MARA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITF.TO Bitfarms Ltd | -15.48% | 51.64% | -44.68% | 587.50% | -91.22% | 155.20% | 400.00% | -75.00% |
MARA Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. | -7.90% | -48.91% | -22.47% | 571.71% | -88.85% | 211.91% | 1,064.46% | -60.81% |
Different Trading Currencies
BITF.TO is traded in CAD, while MARA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MARA values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
BITF.TO:
-CA$0.23
MARA:
-$4.32
BITF.TO:
5.62
MARA:
2.73
BITF.TO:
CA$270.06M
MARA:
$907.09M
BITF.TO:
-CA$7.52M
MARA:
$576.49M
BITF.TO:
CA$19.14M
MARA:
-$559.37M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITF.TO achieves a -15.48% return, which is significantly lower than MARA's -11.94% return.
BITF.TO
- 1D
- 6.64%
- 1M
- -9.00%
- YTD
- -15.48%
- 6M
- -30.53%
- 1Y
- 141.59%
- 3Y*
- 28.39%
- 5Y*
- -15.32%
- 10Y*
- —
MARA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -11.01%
- YTD
- -11.94%
- 6M
- -57.31%
- 1Y
- -34.42%
- 3Y*
- -2.72%
- 5Y*
- -29.27%
- 10Y*
- -12.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITF.TO vs. MARA — Risk / Return Rank
BITF.TO
MARA
BITF.TO vs. MARA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitfarms Ltd (BITF.TO) and Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BITF.TO | MARA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.29 | -0.43 | +1.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.36 | -0.18 | +2.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.98 | +0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | -0.55 | +2.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.12 | -1.05 | +4.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BITF.TO | MARA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | -0.43 | +1.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 | -0.28 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | -0.10 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between BITF.TO and MARA is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BITF.TO vs. MARA - Dividend Comparison
Neither BITF.TO nor MARA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BITF.TO vs. MARA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITF.TO drawdown since its inception was -95.19%, roughly equal to the maximum MARA drawdown of -99.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITF.TO and MARA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITF.TO | MARA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.19% | -99.74% | +4.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.40% | -70.53% | -3.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.19% | -95.87% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.25% | -94.73% | +19.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.05% | -77.82% | +7.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.87% | 36.95% | +3.92% |
Volatility
BITF.TO vs. MARA - Volatility Comparison
Bitfarms Ltd (BITF.TO) and Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) have volatilities of 25.59% and 25.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BITF.TO | MARA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.59% | 25.14% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 82.25% | 61.18% | +21.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 110.81% | 81.22% | +29.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 104.05% | 105.87% | -1.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 121.24% | 143.03% | -21.79% |
Financials
BITF.TO vs. MARA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bitfarms Ltd and Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities