BITF.TO vs. LGD.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Bitfarms Ltd (BITF.TO) and Liberty Gold Corp. (LGD.TO).

Performance

BITF.TO vs. LGD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Bitfarms Ltd (BITF.TO) and Liberty Gold Corp. (LGD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BITF.TO vs. LGD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BITF.TO Bitfarms Ltd	-15.48%	51.64%	-44.68%	587.50%	-91.22%	155.20%	400.00%	-75.00%
LGD.TO Liberty Gold Corp.	40.96%	219.23%	-16.13%	-44.64%	-42.27%	-44.25%	59.63%	84.75%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BITF.TO : CA$1.52B LGD.TO : CA$601.32M
EPS BITF.TO : -CA$0.23 LGD.TO : -CA$0.05
PB Ratio BITF.TO : 2.49 LGD.TO : 16.05
Total Revenue (TTM) BITF.TO : CA$270.06M LGD.TO : CA$0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) BITF.TO : -CA$7.52M LGD.TO : -CA$154.10K
EBITDA (TTM) BITF.TO : CA$19.14M LGD.TO : -CA$25.06M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITF.TO achieves a -15.48% return, which is significantly lower than LGD.TO's 40.96% return.

BITF.TO

• 1D: 6.64%
• 1M: -9.00%
• YTD: -15.48%
• 6M: -30.53%
• 1Y: 141.59%
• 3Y*: 28.39%
• 5Y*: -15.32%
• 10Y*: —

LGD.TO

• 1D: 8.33%
• 1M: -25.95%
• YTD: 40.96%
• 6M: 85.71%
• 1Y: 244.12%
• 3Y*: 25.64%
• 5Y*: -4.07%
• 10Y*: 8.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BITF.TO vs. LGD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITF.TO

BITF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 78
BITF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
BITF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
BITF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 79
BITF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
BITF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 68

LGD.TO

LGD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 96
LGD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
LGD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
LGD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 94
LGD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
LGD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITF.TO vs. LGD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitfarms Ltd (BITF.TO) and Liberty Gold Corp. (LGD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BITF.TO	LGD.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	3.51	-2.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	3.68	-1.32
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.47	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.71	6.05	-4.33
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.12	20.24	-17.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BITF.TO vs. LGD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the LGD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITF.TO and LGD.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BITF.TO	LGD.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.29	3.51	-2.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.15	-0.06	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	0.03	+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between BITF.TO and LGD.TO is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BITF.TO vs. LGD.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither BITF.TO nor LGD.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BITF.TO vs. LGD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITF.TO drawdown since its inception was -95.19%, roughly equal to the maximum LGD.TO drawdown of -99.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITF.TO and LGD.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITF.TO	LGD.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.19%	-99.66%	+4.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-74.40%	-41.21%	-33.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-95.19%	-87.15%	-8.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-90.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-75.25%	-98.25%	+23.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-70.05%	-75.96%	+5.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.87%	12.32%	+28.55%

Volatility

BITF.TO vs. LGD.TO - Volatility Comparison

Bitfarms Ltd (BITF.TO) has a higher volatility of 25.59% compared to Liberty Gold Corp. (LGD.TO) at 23.20%. This indicates that BITF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BITF.TO	LGD.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.59%	23.20%	+2.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	82.25%	50.75%	+31.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	110.81%	70.05%	+40.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	104.05%	66.95%	+37.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	121.24%	64.97%	+56.27%

Financials