BITC vs. CBXO
BITC (Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF) and CBXO (Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - BITC is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Bitwise, while CBXO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. Both are actively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BITC charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBXO.
Performance
BITC vs. CBXO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITC achieves a 6.98% return, which is significantly higher than CBXO's -3.67% return.
BITC
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- -4.31%
- YTD
- 6.98%
- 6M
- -1.22%
- 1Y
- -15.09%
- 3Y*
- 36.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBXO
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- -3.67%
- 6M
- -5.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITC vs. CBXO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BITC Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF | 6.98% | -17.37% |
CBXO Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | -3.67% | -8.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITC and CBXO is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITC vs. CBXO — Risk / Return Rank
BITC
CBXO
BITC vs. CBXO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBXO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BITC | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.82 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BITC | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | -2.36 | +3.03 |
Drawdowns
BITC vs. CBXO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITC drawdown since its inception was -38.51%, which is greater than CBXO's maximum drawdown of -11.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITC and CBXO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITC | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.51% | -11.40% | -27.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.48% | -11.40% | -15.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.37% | -8.46% | -7.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.37% | — | — |
Volatility
BITC vs. CBXO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITC | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.39% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.98% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.54% | 7.23% | +18.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.65% | 7.23% | +39.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.65% | 7.23% | +39.42% |
BITC vs. CBXO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITC has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than CBXO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITC vs. CBXO - Dividend Comparison
BITC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, more than CBXO's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BITC Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF | 3.14% | 3.36% | 42.68% | 5.82% |
CBXO Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.53% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BITC and CBXO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBXO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBXO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for BITC.
BITC has the higher dividend yield at 3.14%, compared with 0.53% for CBXO.
BITC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBXO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for BITC and 0.69% for CBXO.
Find the right allocation for BITC and CBXO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer