BITB vs. IBLC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BITB (Bitwise Bitcoin ETF) and IBLC (iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - BITB tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant while IBLC tracks the ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BITB returned -39.79% vs 63.95% for IBLC. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BITB charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IBLC.

Performance

BITB vs. IBLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITB achieves a -28.85% return, which is significantly lower than IBLC's 27.22% return.

BITB

• 1D: -3.23%
• 1M: -17.74%
• YTD: -28.85%
• 6M: -28.92%
• 1Y: -39.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBLC

• 1D: -2.19%
• 1M: -0.02%
• YTD: 27.22%
• 6M: 19.07%
• 1Y: 63.95%
• 3Y*: 45.22%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITB vs. IBLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BITB Bitwise Bitcoin ETF	-28.85%	-6.47%	89.74%
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF	27.22%	27.05%	20.96%

Correlation

The correlation between BITB and IBLC is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.70

The correlation between BITB and IBLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BITB vs. IBLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITB

BITB Risk / Return Rank: 2
BITB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BITB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BITB Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BITB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BITB Martin Ratio Rank: 2

IBLC

IBLC Risk / Return Rank: 30
IBLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
IBLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
IBLC Omega Ratio Rank: 32
IBLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
IBLC Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITB vs. IBLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BITB	IBLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.90	1.15	-2.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.26	1.73	-2.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	1.21	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.77	1.43	-2.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.30	2.80	-4.11

BITB vs. IBLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITB Sharpe Ratio is -0.90, which is lower than the IBLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITB and IBLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BITB vs. IBLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITB drawdown since its inception was -52.04%, smaller than the maximum IBLC drawdown of -62.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITB and IBLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITB	IBLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.04%	-62.54%	+10.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.04%	-44.94%	-7.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-51.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.43%	-16.36%	-34.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.85%	-25.76%	+8.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.56%	22.89%	+7.67%

Volatility

BITB vs. IBLC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB) is 13.08%, while iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) has a volatility of 16.66%. This indicates that BITB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BITB	IBLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.08%	16.66%	-3.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.58%	41.64%	-7.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.20%	55.87%	-11.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.00%	64.51%	-14.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.00%	64.51%	-14.51%

BITB vs. IBLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IBLC's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

BITB vs. IBLC - Dividend Comparison

BITB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BITB Bitwise Bitcoin ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF	4.92%	6.31%	1.60%	1.79%	0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BITB and IBLC in my portfolio?

BITB and IBLC have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BITB or IBLC?

IBLC has higher volatility (16.66%) compared to BITB (13.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITB dropped -52.04% vs IBLC's -62.54%.

Which ETF is better, BITB or IBLC?

On 1-year performance, IBLC leads with 63.95% vs -39.79% for BITB. On fees, BITB is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, BITB has been the lower-risk option at 13.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BITB or IBLC?

Over the 1-year period, IBLC has performed better with a 63.95% return vs -39.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BITB or IBLC?

BITB is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IBLC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BITB or IBLC?

IBLC has the higher dividend yield at 4.92%, compared with 0.00% for BITB.

What is the main difference between BITB and IBLC?

BITB tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while IBLC tracks ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise Asset Management and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for BITB and 0.47% for IBLC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.