PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITB vs. EZU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITB vs. EZU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB) and iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITB achieves a -27.42% return, which is significantly lower than EZU's 9.10% return.


BITB

1D
0.03%
1M
-19.63%
YTD
-27.42%
6M
-29.61%
1Y
-39.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EZU

1D
0.00%
1M
6.05%
YTD
9.10%
6M
10.35%
1Y
22.18%
3Y*
18.40%
5Y*
9.24%
10Y*
10.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITB vs. EZU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BITB
Bitwise Bitcoin ETF
-27.42%-6.47%89.74%
EZU
iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF
9.10%40.00%4.03%

Correlation

The correlation between BITB and EZU is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITB vs. EZU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITB
BITB Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BITB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITB Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITB Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BITB Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITB Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

EZU
EZU Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
EZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZU Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
EZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZU Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITB vs. EZU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB) and iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BITBEZUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.21

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

1.55

-2.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.37

5.60

-6.98

BITB vs. EZU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITB Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is lower than the EZU Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITB and EZU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BITB vs. EZU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITB drawdown since its inception was -52.04%, smaller than the maximum EZU drawdown of -65.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITB and EZU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITBEZUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.04%

-65.32%

+13.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.04%

-13.06%

-38.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.44%

0.00%

-49.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.54%

-19.21%

+2.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.62%

3.61%

+26.01%

Volatility

BITB vs. EZU - Volatility Comparison

Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB) has a higher volatility of 11.94% compared to iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) at 6.52%. This indicates that BITB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EZU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITBEZUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.94%

6.52%

+5.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.40%

14.88%

+19.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.98%

17.57%

+26.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.04%

19.96%

+30.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.04%

20.50%

+29.54%

BITB vs. EZU - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EZU's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

BITB vs. EZU - Dividend Comparison

BITB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BITB
Bitwise Bitcoin ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EZU
iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF
2.61%2.85%2.90%2.56%2.79%2.46%2.13%2.84%3.47%1.91%3.07%2.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


BITB and EZU have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITB has higher volatility (11.94%) compared to EZU (6.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITB dropped -52.04% vs EZU's -65.32%.

On 1-year performance, EZU leads with 22.18% vs -39.67% for BITB. On fees, BITB is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, EZU has been the lower-risk option at 6.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EZU has performed better with a 22.18% return vs -39.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BITB is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for EZU.

EZU has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.00% for BITB.

BITB is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while EZU is Europe Equities. BITB tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while EZU tracks MSCI EMU. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise Asset Management and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for BITB and 0.51% for EZU.

EZU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITB and EZU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer