PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BISAX vs. LZISX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BISAX vs. LZISX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund (BISAX) and Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio (LZISX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BISAX achieves a -1.31% return, which is significantly lower than LZISX's 30.03% return. Over the past 10 years, BISAX has outperformed LZISX with an annualized return of 10.57%, while LZISX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.14% annualized return.


BISAX

1D
-0.46%
1M
-1.95%
YTD
-1.31%
6M
-0.61%
1Y
10.95%
3Y*
26.85%
5Y*
16.97%
10Y*
10.57%

LZISX

1D
1.85%
1M
4.24%
YTD
30.03%
6M
27.97%
1Y
46.05%
3Y*
19.98%
5Y*
7.21%
10Y*
8.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BISAX vs. LZISX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BISAX
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund
-1.31%45.50%23.18%39.03%-8.68%18.39%4.62%6.80%-20.13%11.52%
LZISX
Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio
30.03%35.95%-3.68%11.59%-26.34%12.36%13.45%25.49%-24.90%36.67%

Correlation

The correlation between BISAX and LZISX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2012

0.79

The correlation between BISAX and LZISX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BISAX vs. LZISX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BISAX
BISAX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
BISAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BISAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
BISAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
BISAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
BISAX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

LZISX
LZISX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
LZISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LZISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
LZISX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
LZISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
LZISX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BISAX vs. LZISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund (BISAX) and Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio (LZISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BISAXLZISXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.39

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

3.77

-2.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.41

14.57

-12.16

BISAX vs. LZISX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BISAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the LZISX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BISAX and LZISX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BISAX vs. LZISX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BISAX drawdown since its inception was -47.30%, smaller than the maximum LZISX drawdown of -65.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BISAX and LZISX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BISAXLZISXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.30%

-65.43%

+18.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-12.10%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.63%

-15.88%

+4.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.44%

-42.01%

+10.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.30%

-44.80%

-2.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.45%

0.00%

-9.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.04%

-14.76%

+6.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.33%

3.13%

+1.20%

Volatility

BISAX vs. LZISX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund (BISAX) is 3.52%, while Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio (LZISX) has a volatility of 7.46%. This indicates that BISAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LZISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BISAXLZISXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

7.46%

-3.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.36%

16.44%

-6.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.51%

20.04%

-7.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

17.74%

-3.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.28%

17.14%

-2.86%

BISAX vs. LZISX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BISAX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than LZISX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

BISAX vs. LZISX - Dividend Comparison

BISAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than LZISX's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BISAX
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund
3.27%3.23%3.06%2.81%3.87%3.46%0.81%0.66%3.88%8.33%4.00%3.44%
LZISX
Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio
1.47%1.91%1.89%2.08%5.44%36.78%2.07%2.10%4.62%0.00%2.96%0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


BISAX and LZISX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LZISX has higher volatility (7.46%) compared to BISAX (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BISAX dropped -47.30% vs LZISX's -65.43%.

LZISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BISAX and LZISX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer