BIS vs. SOXL
BIS (ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology) and SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - BIS tracks the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (-200%) while SOXL tracks the ICE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BIS returned -23.34%/yr vs 65.39%/yr for SOXL. At a correlation of -0.51, they often move in opposite directions. BIS charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SOXL.
Performance
BIS vs. SOXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIS achieves a -6.36% return, which is significantly lower than SOXL's 567.48% return. Over the past 10 years, BIS has underperformed SOXL with an annualized return of -23.34%, while SOXL has yielded a comparatively higher 65.39% annualized return.
BIS
- 1D
- -3.65%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- YTD
- -6.36%
- 6M
- -4.11%
- 1Y
- -49.58%
- 3Y*
- -21.43%
- 5Y*
- -14.49%
- 10Y*
- -23.34%
SOXL
- 1D
- 5.34%
- 1M
- 119.95%
- YTD
- 567.48%
- 6M
- 502.28%
- 1Y
- 1,438.30%
- 3Y*
- 135.13%
- 5Y*
- 48.72%
- 10Y*
- 65.39%
BIS vs. SOXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIS ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology | -6.36% | -45.95% | 4.79% | -6.54% | -2.14% | -14.74% | -56.01% | -41.01% | 5.14% | -36.98% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 567.48% | 54.91% | -12.31% | 226.98% | -85.66% | 118.84% | 70.04% | 231.83% | -39.07% | 141.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIS and SOXL is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2010 | -0.51 |
The correlation between BIS and SOXL shifts across timeframes, from -0.51 (all time) to -0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIS vs. SOXL — Risk / Return Rank
BIS
SOXL
BIS vs. SOXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIS) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIS | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -15.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.72 | -0.94 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | 33.47 | -34.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 114.79 | -116.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIS | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.25 | 14.28 | -15.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.33 | 0.46 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.50 | 0.66 | -1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | 0.52 | -1.19 |
Drawdowns
BIS vs. SOXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIS drawdown since its inception was -99.87%, which is greater than SOXL's maximum drawdown of -90.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIS and SOXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIS | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.87% | -90.46% | -9.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.50% | -43.47% | -11.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.87% | -87.88% | +21.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.80% | -90.46% | +15.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.25% | -90.46% | -4.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.85% | 0.00% | -99.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.03% | -35.01% | -55.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.59% | 12.65% | +26.94% |
Volatility
BIS vs. SOXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIS) is 13.87%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a volatility of 40.82%. This indicates that BIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIS | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.87% | 40.82% | -26.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.95% | 81.29% | -50.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.68% | 102.11% | -62.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.74% | 107.25% | -63.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.36% | 99.04% | -52.68% |
BIS vs. SOXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIS has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXL's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BIS vs. SOXL - Dividend Comparison
BIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, more than SOXL's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIS ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology | 4.92% | 5.25% | 3.73% | 1.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.45% | 2.11% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 0.03% | 0.34% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 1.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.38% | 1.30% | 0.09% | 4.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BIS and SOXL have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXL has higher volatility (40.82%) compared to BIS (13.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIS dropped -99.87% vs SOXL's -90.46%.
On 10-year performance, SOXL leads with 65.39% vs -23.34% for BIS. On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BIS has been the lower-risk option at 13.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXL has performed better with a 65.39% return vs -23.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BIS.
BIS has the higher dividend yield at 4.92%, compared with 0.03% for SOXL.
BIS tracks NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (-200%), while SOXL tracks ICE Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BIS and 0.75% for SOXL.
SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.28 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BIS and SOXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer