BIS vs. ORLG
BIS (ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology) and ORLG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ORLY Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - BIS tracks the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (-200%) while ORLG tracks the O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. (ORLY). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.25, they often move in opposite directions. BIS charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ORLG.
Performance
BIS vs. ORLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BIS
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -17.66%
- 6M
- -25.29%
- YTD
- -26.96%
- 1Y
- -55.63%
- 3Y*
- -28.12%
- 5Y*
- -16.97%
- 10Y*
- -25.40%
ORLG
- 1D
- 8.37%
- 1M
- -11.93%
- 6M
- -23.86%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BIS vs. ORLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BIS ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology | -23.23% |
ORLG Leverage Shares 2X Long ORLY Daily ETF | -25.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIS and ORLG is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2026 | -0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIS vs. ORLG — Risk / Return Rank
BIS
ORLG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BIS vs. ORLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIS) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ORLY Daily ETF (ORLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BIS | ORLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.42 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BIS vs. ORLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIS drawdown since its inception was -99.89%, which is greater than ORLG's maximum drawdown of -39.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIS and ORLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIS | ORLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.89% | -39.93% | -59.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -73.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.88% | -34.91% | -64.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.08% | -20.65% | -69.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.12% | — | — |
Volatility
BIS vs. ORLG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIS | ORLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.90% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.05% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.70% | 59.08% | -18.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.97% | 59.08% | -15.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.18% | 59.08% | -12.90% |
BIS vs. ORLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIS has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ORLG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BIS vs. ORLG - Dividend Comparison
BIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.78%, while ORLG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIS ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology | 5.78% | 5.25% | 3.73% | 1.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.45% | 2.11% | 0.37% |
ORLG Leverage Shares 2X Long ORLY Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BIS and ORLG have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ORLG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ORLG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BIS.
BIS has the higher dividend yield at 5.78%, compared with 0.00% for ORLG.
BIS tracks NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (-200%), while ORLG tracks O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. (ORLY). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BIS and 0.75% for ORLG.
Find the right allocation for BIS and ORLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer