PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIPIX vs. INPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIPIX vs. INPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund (BIPIX) and ProFunds Internet UltraSector Fund (INPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIPIX achieves a 4.28% return, which is significantly lower than INPIX's 7.23% return. Over the past 10 years, BIPIX has underperformed INPIX with an annualized return of 6.09%, while INPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.29% annualized return.


BIPIX

1D
-6.59%
1M
-6.97%
YTD
4.28%
6M
4.61%
1Y
83.18%
3Y*
4.78%
5Y*
0.73%
10Y*
6.09%

INPIX

1D
-2.03%
1M
10.05%
YTD
7.23%
6M
5.52%
1Y
14.00%
3Y*
26.86%
5Y*
0.04%
10Y*
23.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIPIX vs. INPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIPIX
ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund
4.28%47.99%-25.91%9.55%-13.43%5.00%19.94%23.65%-12.15%34.71%
INPIX
ProFunds Internet UltraSector Fund
7.23%9.88%41.50%76.21%-63.24%-1.09%254.85%25.95%4.78%44.61%

Correlation

The correlation between BIPIX and INPIX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2000

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between BIPIX and INPIX has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIPIX vs. INPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIPIX
BIPIX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
BIPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
BIPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

INPIX
INPIX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
INPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
INPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
INPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
INPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIPIX vs. INPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund (BIPIX) and ProFunds Internet UltraSector Fund (INPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIPIXINPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.11

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.75

0.46

+5.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.49

1.11

+16.38

BIPIX vs. INPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIPIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the INPIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIPIX and INPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIPIXINPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

0.52

+1.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.00

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.47

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.11

+0.04

Drawdowns

BIPIX vs. INPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIPIX drawdown since its inception was -84.51%, smaller than the maximum INPIX drawdown of -95.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIPIX and INPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIPIXINPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.51%

-95.64%

+11.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.15%

-32.04%

+16.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.50%

-35.68%

-23.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.86%

-73.41%

+9.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.86%

-73.41%

+9.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.45%

-15.80%

-0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.22%

-46.24%

+9.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.97%

13.27%

-8.30%

Volatility

BIPIX vs. INPIX - Volatility Comparison

ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund (BIPIX) has a higher volatility of 14.22% compared to ProFunds Internet UltraSector Fund (INPIX) at 7.05%. This indicates that BIPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIPIXINPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.22%

7.05%

+7.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.38%

21.60%

+8.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.37%

28.47%

+9.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.70%

41.04%

-1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.37%

49.69%

-13.32%

BIPIX vs. INPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIPIX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than INPIX's 1.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIPIX vs. INPIX - Dividend Comparison

BIPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, while INPIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIPIX
ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund
0.35%0.37%0.23%6.69%0.00%0.79%12.09%3.26%5.52%7.19%0.00%0.00%
INPIX
ProFunds Internet UltraSector Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%9.45%21.43%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.18%6.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIPIX and INPIX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIPIX has higher volatility (14.22%) compared to INPIX (7.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIPIX dropped -84.51% vs INPIX's -95.64%.

BIPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIPIX and INPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer