BIPIX vs. QLD

In the year-to-date period, BIPIX achieves a 3.29% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 10.05% return. Over the past 10 years, BIPIX has underperformed QLD with an annualized return of -3.79%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively higher 29.32% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BIPIX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QLD's 0.95% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund (BIPIX) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BIPIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the QLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIPIX and QLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

BIPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than QLD's 0.23% yield.

The maximum BIPIX drawdown since its inception was -84.51%, roughly equal to the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIPIX and QLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund (BIPIX) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) have volatilities of 9.45% and 9.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.