BIPIX vs. ENPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund (BIPIX) and ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund (ENPIX).
BIPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Jun 18, 2000. ENPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Jun 18, 2000.
Performance
BIPIX vs. ENPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BIPIX vs. ENPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIPIX ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund | 5.27% | 47.99% | -5.81% | 9.55% | -13.43% | 5.00% | 19.94% | 23.65% | -12.15% | 34.71% |
ENPIX ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund | 62.19% | 4.99% | 2.30% | -7.46% | 92.17% | 82.32% | -53.71% | 10.35% | -30.54% | -5.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIPIX achieves a 5.27% return, which is significantly lower than ENPIX's 62.19% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BIPIX having a 9.43% annualized return and ENPIX not far ahead at 9.73%.
BIPIX
- 1D
- 11.19%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 5.27%
- 6M
- 37.75%
- 1Y
- 96.10%
- 3Y*
- 20.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.71%
- 10Y*
- 9.43%
ENPIX
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- 13.78%
- YTD
- 62.19%
- 6M
- 62.22%
- 1Y
- 48.66%
- 3Y*
- 20.76%
- 5Y*
- 31.04%
- 10Y*
- 9.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BIPIX vs. ENPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIPIX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is lower than ENPIX's 1.51% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BIPIX vs. ENPIX — Risk / Return Rank
BIPIX
ENPIX
BIPIX vs. ENPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund (BIPIX) and ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund (ENPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIPIX | ENPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.97 | 1.42 | +0.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.54 | 1.82 | +0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.27 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | 1.89 | +1.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.86 | 4.23 | +8.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIPIX | ENPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 1.42 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.80 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.22 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.13 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between BIPIX and ENPIX is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BIPIX vs. ENPIX - Dividend Comparison
BIPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than ENPIX's 1.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIPIX ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund | 0.35% | 0.37% | 28.81% | 6.69% | 0.00% | 0.79% | 12.09% | 3.26% | 5.52% | 7.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ENPIX ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund | 1.70% | 2.76% | 3.19% | 0.87% | 2.76% | 1.59% | 1.76% | 1.34% | 1.76% | 0.84% | 0.57% | 0.56% |
Drawdowns
BIPIX vs. ENPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIPIX drawdown since its inception was -84.51%, smaller than the maximum ENPIX drawdown of -90.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIPIX and ENPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIPIX | ENPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.51% | -90.12% | +5.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.79% | -27.20% | +7.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.56% | -36.48% | -18.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.56% | -84.54% | +29.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.66% | -1.60% | -4.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.73% | -37.08% | +0.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.78% | 12.11% | -6.33% |
Volatility
BIPIX vs. ENPIX - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund (BIPIX) has a higher volatility of 17.20% compared to ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund (ENPIX) at 7.58%. This indicates that BIPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BIPIX | ENPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.20% | 7.58% | +9.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.74% | 21.01% | +7.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.01% | 37.11% | +6.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.70% | 38.87% | -1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.50% | 44.55% | -9.05% |